For answers to many questions, consult the CURRENT MONTHLY REVISED EDITION of the Official Traditional Catholic Directory, Listing All Traditional Latin Masses and Traditional Resources for North America. For further information, click on the TRADITIO Network's Official Traditional Catholic Directory department, provided to the TRADITIO Network by the National Registry of Traditional Latin Masses.
If you wish to support the TRADITIO Network's Apostolate, click on the box to the left to made a donation easily, securely, and confidentially by bank account or credit card through PayPal. Regular contributors become Benefactors of the TRADITIO Network, and their intentions are specially commemorated at Traditional Latin Masses offered. Using PayPal reduces our administrative burden considerably, but if need to use a paper check, click on FAQ01: How Can I Help the TRADITIO Network's Apostolate?
You thought that Benedict-Ratzinger's 2008 Encyclical Letter Caritas in veritate was bad? That was his last encyclical, in which he called on "supra-national" organizations, like the European Union, to take control of the world. Of course, that is before the worm turned, and the European Union took sanctions against Ratzinger's own Vatican Bank for money-laundering and Mafia corruption.
Francis-Bergoglio's first Apostolic Exhortation, Evangelii gaudium, issued November 24, 2013, has left Ratzingers' autocratic socialism far behind and taken up a completely anti-Catholic Communist and sycretistic policy. Bergoglio rambles on for over 200 pages describing his New Newchurch. Don't bother trying to read anything official, however; he couldn't be bothered to get out an official Latin version. Here are the pillars of the anti-Catholic New Newchurch that Bergoglio is forming to replace Newchurch, just as Newchurch replaced the Catholic Church in 1963:
Good Catholics, why should you be surprised that Bergoglio exposes himself as a Communist and syncretist? He hails from the Newjesuit order, which became a terrorist group in the Vatican era II under the banner of "liberation theology," when it violently imposed a completely Communistic system in Paraguay and other Latin American countries, with no individual rights and no private property. Granted, the Post-Modernist Bergoglio is more sophisticated. He doesn't take up guns, but now propagandizes in anti-Catholic "Apostolic Exhortations." We traditional Catholics don't pray contra nequitiam et insidias Diaboli at the end of Mass for nothing!
In a letter dated November 19, 2013, Francis-Bergoglio attempted to claim that the Modernist Vatican II Council (1962-1965) was in an "heremeneutic of reform" with the dogmatic Council of Trent (1545-1563). Bergoglio thus twisted even Benedict-Ratzinger's "heremeneutic of continuity," which itself is a monumental falsification of the truth. Anyone who looks at the Traditional Latin Mass of 1570 will see no real connection with the Protestant-Masonic-Pagan invalid New Order Mess of 1969. Trent anathematized the Modernist heresies; Vatican II and its Newpopes embrace them.
Bergoglio went on to state, in words reeking of the odor of heresy, how the "hermeneutic of reform," which Ratzinger concocted in a fruitless effort to explain how the 180-degree-opposed Tridentine and Novus Ordinarian, "relates not less to the Tridentine than to the [Second] Vatican Council." Recently, the Bologna theological school has best demonstrated how the Modernist Vatican II Council is a kind of "Copernican revolution," a transformation to "another Catholicism" that is a succotash of heresies. [Some information for this Commentary was contributed by Catholic World News.]
Good Catholics, this "heremeneutic of continuity" or "heremeneutic of reform" is more Modernist gobbledegook on the part of Ratzinger and now Bergoglio to prove that the moon is made of green cheese. Does anyone have the foggiest idea what a "heremeneutic" is anyway? This is the same hoax that changed the traditional Catholic Latin vocabulary into a phony New Order patois: "sermons" became "homilies," "communion" became "eucharist," "Mass" became "liturgy." And with the change of vocabulary Catholics lost their Church to heretical Modernists like the Freemason presbyter Hannibal Bugnini, chief architect of the invalid New Order "liturgy."
Now the numbers are in. Francis-Bergoglio's "charm offensive" to do away with what was left of Catholic doctrine and morals in his Newchurch of the New Order has been an utter failure. His self-expressed goal to bring the fallen-away back into New Order temples has flatlined.
The respected Pew Research Center has determined that all of the Bergoglian hoopla has produced an opposite effect: many Newchurchers "have expressed dismay" over his statements about homosexuality and Newchurchers being "obsessed" with moral issues such as abortion. In fact, the clueless secular and religious press has concocted stories about Bergoglio's supposed popularity creating a "Francis effect" that has produced a "significant global rise in [New]church attendance." Pew Research has found that statement to be utterly false.
A new analysis of pooled Pew Research surveys conducted between Bergoglio's election in March 2013 and the end of October 2013 finds that, at least in the United States, where Bergoglio is supposed to be popular with 79 per cent of Newchurchers, the percentage of Americans who identify as Newchurch has remained the same as in 2012. Pew also found that attendance at the New Order Mess has remained virtually unchanged since Bergoglio was elected. [Some information for this Commentary was contributed by the Pew Forum.]
Good Catholics, the Catholic Church cannot be restored by the "charm" of a Modernist Newpope reeking with the odor of heresy, as the Catholic term puts it. Newchurch doesn't need a Bergoglio; it needs a Pope St. Pius X. And today even that won't be enough because the Newchurchers are far more corrupted in 2013 than they were in 1903.
Even before Francis-Bergoglio began to wage war on Newchurch's "Latin Mess," Elenito Galido, Newbishop of Iligan, Philippines, quoted Benedict-Ratzinger's 2007 Motu Proprio Summorum pontificum declaring the Half Novus Ordo Vatican II Mess of 1962+ to be the New Order sect's "Extraordinary Form," and the invalid Full-blown Protestant-Masonic-Pagan New Order service of 1969 to be its "Ordinary Form," as the authority to stop the "Extraordinary" Mess. Both the "Extraordinary" and "Ordinary" Forms were engineered by the Freemason presbyter Hannibal Bugnini, who used the "modernized" 1962 form as a stepping stone to usher in the invalid 1969 form.
Galido declared that according to Ratzinger's Motu Proprio, each Newbishop is the "moderator of the liturgy" his diocese. Using that "time-bomb" planted by Ratzinger into his Motu, Galido determined on September 13, 2012, "to officially forbid" the "Motu" Mess in his Newdiocese, specifically the ones sponsored by the Latin Mass Society, which is committed to promoting the "Extraordinary Mess." Here we have a resuscitated use the the "time-bomb" stratagem to kill off even the Half New Order "Motu" Mess. At the Modernist Vatican II Council, when the Fathers were meeting, the words of the documents appeared to be relatively unobjectionable on the surface, but "time-bombs" were planted by the Modernists, so that the post-conciliar implementers, such as the Freemason presbyter Bugnini, could destroy the Catholic Faith.
One example of this "time-bomb" stratagem was the inclusion of the use of vulgar tongues in the Mass as an exception (Constitution Sacrosanctum Concilium, Secs. 36.1 and 36.2). Under the cagey implementation of Bugnini, this "exception," within five years, became the rule, and the proper Roman Catholic Latin Language was essentially expelled.
Another example of this "time-bomb" stratagem was Josef Ratzinger's introduction of a Modernist definition of the Catholic Church in the Constitution Lumen gentium. This constitution rejected the dogmatic teaching that "the Church of Christ is the Catholic Church" and substituted for it the Modernist teaching that the Church of Christ merely "subsisted in" [substitit in] the Catholic Church. This "time-bomb" led to Newpopes co-presiding at worship services in Protestant churches, Jewish temples, and even Mohammedan mosques, as did Ratzinger himself -- no "traditionalist" he!
Good Catholics, just as we TRADITIO Fathers warned in 2007, Ratzinger's "Motu" Mess, aka erroneously as the "Extraordinary Form," is truly just the Great "Motu" Mess Hoax that has taken in many pseudo-traditionalists, who would rather serve the "Satan" of the New Order (as Newpope Paul VI-Montini put it) than the true God. Now they are paying the price for their treason, just as did Faust to the Devil.
James MacMillan is a Scottish composer, whose symphonies, concerti, operas, sacred music, and many orchestral and instrumental works are strongly influenced by traditional Catholic music. But like so many post Vatican II composers, he fell in with composing profane music for the New Order sect. Now MacMillan has seen a dim light. He has decided to stop writing congregational music for the New Order sect.
MacMillan calls post Vatican II compositions "music for old hippies" and "mind-numbing, depressing banality." He describes these compositions as "musically illiterate, almost is if they were written by semi-trained teenagers, getting to grips with musical rudiments. The style is stodgy and sentimental, tonally and rhythmically stilted, melodically inane." MacMillan says that there is too much music being created, at the same time that the vast repository of traditional Catholic music is ignored and wilfully forgotten. Therefore, he has established a new organization dedicated to reviving the practice of Gregorian chant, Music Sacra Scotland.
So far, so good, but then MacMillan's dim light goes entirely out. He praises the use of vulgar tongues in supposedly sacred music, just as the Protestant Anglican sect does, a usage condemned by the dogmatic Council of Trent. That sect has now become part of the Newchurch of the New Order in the Novus Ordo Anglican "ordinariate," established by Benedict-Ratzinger in 2009, who officially declared for the first time that the usually vulgar-tongued Novus Ordo invalid "Ordinary Rite" is the rite of the New Order sect.
Good Catholics, MacMillan is just like the rest of the neocons in the New Order sect. They satisfy themselves with a little frosting of the demi-traditional on top of the lethal arsenic cake of the Novus Ordo.
Before the Modernist Vatican II Council could perpetrate any of its great damage to the Catholic Faith, God saw fit to bring home U.S. President John Kennedy, on November 22, 1963, in a most violent way. But a merciful God saw fit to ensure that the first Catholic President of the United States would have a truly Catholic funeral. On the day of the President's assassination, Pope John XXIII had been dead for over five months. Not a single document of the Modernist Council had yet been promulgated. Paul VI-Montini, who was later to admit that the Council's "liturgy constitution" introduced the "smoke of Satan around the altar," did not promulgate that document until twelve days later, on December 4, 1963.
In the intervening fifty years, more has come out about President Kennedy's Catholic faith. Reports have been coming out even now demonstrating that, far from having merely a Catholic veneer for political purposes, his Catholic Faith ran deep. One can only hope that the graces of the many Masses at which he had assisted over his lifetime stood as a great help in the balance of the Particular Judgment. Before they passed on recently, several close sources have revealed that Kennedy was wont to attend Mass unobtrusively during the week, and even when away from the White House, he would ask locals, wherever he found himself, where there was a Mass nearby. Frequently, he quietly slipped off to assist at such Masses.
It is a truism of the Catholic Faith that great sinners are often found to have great Faith. The best example of this principle is St. Augustine of Hippo, who was a fornicator and fathered an illegitimate child, but eventually became one of the greatest Saints of the Church. St. Augustine had had the good favor to have a deeply-Catholic mother, St. Monica, as did John Kennedy in his mother, Rose. The Catholic orator, Bishop Fulton Sheen, wrote in one of his books that he didn't worry so much about the great sinners that came to him in Confession. Even though they sinned greatly, they acknowledged their sins before God and kept returning to the Sacraments. Sheen said that he feared rather for those who thought that they never sinned except trivially.
It was about 13:00 local time on the feastday of the Catholic Martyr, St. Cecilia -- a fact that has never been pointed out by the secular or religious press --, November 22, 1963, a Friday that year, as it is this year of 2013, that Msgr. Oscar Huber gave the mortally-wounded and unconscious president conditional absolution, which is the form given when a priest has no way of knowing an unconscious person's internal disposition of soul or whether actual death has occurred: Si capax, ego te absolvo.... The conditional administration of the Sacrament of Penance was followed by Extreme Unction and the imparting of the Plenary Indulgence, dependent for its action, of course, upon a receptive disposition of the soul. Finally were said the prayers for the Dying and for the Departed Soul:
Grant, O Lord, that while we here lament the departure of Your servant, John, we may ever remember that we are most certainly to follow him. Give us grace to prepare for that last hour by a good life, that we may not be surprised by a sudden death but be ever watching, for when Thou shalt call that soul, we may enter eternal glory through Christ, Our Lord. Eternal rest grant unto him, O Lord and let perpetual light shine upon him. Amen.
On the following Monday, November 25, the President's Requiem Mass was celebrated in St. Matthew's Cathedral in Washington, D.C. Although he, as any Catholic, was properly entitled to a Sung Requiem Mass, the President's widow requested a Low Mass because of the circumstances of the President's sudden death. Some months later, that Sung Requiem Mass was celebrated in regal style at the Boston Cathedral, with the Boston Symphony Orchestra playing Mozart's sublime Requiem, and the seminary choir singing the Gregorian chant for the Solemn Pontifical Requiem Mass.
At 12:15 on the day of the funeral, however, Richard Cardinal Cushing, Archbishop of Boston and a close friend of the Kennedy family, celebrated a Pontifical Low Mass. In accordance with the wise provisions of the Church, in which no eulogy is delivered at a funeral Mass -- for we are not the judges of the soul, but only God is --, the auxiliary bishop of Washington, D.C., Philip Hannan, after the Mass, simply read several scriptural passages that were favorites of the late President.
After the Final Absolution, the cortege exited the cathedral to the chanting of the In Paradisum, one of the most beautiful Antiphons in the Gregorian repertoire, praying that the Angels may lead the departed soul into Paradise. There followed the committal service, also conducted by Cardinal Cushing, which took place at Arlington National Cemetery, watched by hundreds of millions around the world on television.
Good Catholics, subsequent information has indicated that President Kennedy, like all of us, was not a Saint, but a mortal sinner. A recent author has called him a "flawed giant." His life was a combination of glorious highs -- such as the uplifting Ciceronian rhetoric of his 1960 Inaugural Address and the Ich bin ein Berliner speech in West Berlin -- as well as great lows. That is why it is not for man to weigh the inner soul in the balance at death, but rather it is that soul itself, with Christ as its Judge, that will determine whether its final disposition is Heaven or Hell, or a period of purification in Purgatory. Requiescat in pace, Ioannes.
The Vatican Observatory Research Group already operates the 1.8-metre Alice P. Lennon Optical Telescope on Mount Graham in southeastern Arizona, where sky conditions are among the best in the world, and certainly the continental United States. Newvatican has now added a Large Binocular Telescope allows astronomers to observe the faintest and most distant objects in the universe. Each of the binocular instruments is cooled to minus 213 degrees Celsius in order to observe in the near-infrared wavelength range.
Newchurch's choice for a name for the new telescope shocked the Christian world: LUCIFER! Lucifer derives from the Latin, meaning light-bearer. Lucifer was originally the highest of the Angels, but, from the capital sin of pride, got too full of himself and refused to obey God.
Therefore, Lucifer was cast down into Hell, where he was renamed SATAN (from the Hebrew meaning "enemy"), where he presides over the other demons and the damned of humanity. St. Michael, who cast Satan into Hell as God's agent, then became the highest of the Seraphim, the choir of Angels closest to God. This cataclysmic battle in Heaven is recounted in the last book of the New Testament, the Apocalypse of St. John the Apostle (12:7-9/DRV):
And there was a battle in heaven; Michael and his angels fought with the dragon, and the dragon fought, and his angels. And they prevailed not: neither was their place found any more in heaven. And that great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, who is called the devil and Satan, who seduceth the whole world; and he was cast unto the earth and his angels were thrown down with him.
Newchurch plans to build other telescopes dedicated to the Devil, because the first is named LUCIFER 1. LUCIFER 2 is already being built. Newvatican tried to wash its hands of responsibility for the name, but it is an indisputable fact that Newvatican is a leading member of the Mount Graham International Observatory consortium, and even if (hypothetically) Newvatican didn't want the name, the name would not have been used. [Some information for this Commentary was contributed by Astronomy magazine.]
Good Catholics, from all the possible names that Newchurch could have chosen -- from classical mythology or the names of stars or constellations -- Newvatican chose the name of the Devil to be its moniker!
There was an "Extrordinary Form of the Roman Rite" announced around here. Is this a real Traditional Latin Mass, or is it just another Newchurch hoax to deceive traditional Catholics?
The TRADITIO Fathers Reply.
The erroneously-termed "Extraordinary Form" is just another Newchurch hoax to deceive traditional Catholics. In reality, it is the Half New Order Vatican II "Mess of 1962+," which was engineered by the Freemason presbyter Hannibal Bugnini. It became the stepchild in Newpope Benedict-Ratzinger's Great "Motu" Mess Hoax, which declared the non-Apostolic, non-Catholic, invalid Protestant-Masonic-Pagan Novus Ordo service as the "Ordinary Rite" of his Newchurch of the New Order by a motu proprio of 2007. At the same time, in order that the neocons and pseudo-traditionalists didn't just walk out, he threw them the bone of an "Extraordinary Form."
There are several anti-Catholic disasters in Ratzinger's "Extraordinary Form," among them:
The basic truth to take away from all of this: Newchurch does not have a valid "Latin Mass," or any valid Mass for that matter.
Francis-Bergoglio's anti-Catholic juggernaut of secularizing his New Order sect continues unabated. He has already made it clear that he doesn't like the "Motu" Mess of 1962+, erroneousloy aka the "Extraordinary Form." As a result these Half Novus Ordo "Latin Messes" -- which are the product of Vatican II period and are not the Traditional Latin Mass of 1950 -- are being canceled in various locations by Newbishops who want to curry Bergogio's favor.
Now it seems that Bergoglio has put the kibosh on pews and confessionals too. The New Order sect, like most Protestant sects, doesn't want you to kneel, and the Sacrament of Confession was already invalidated as a Sacrament when it was metamorphosed into a Rite of Reconciliation, conducted not by priests ordained in the Sacrament of Holy Orders, but by unordained presbyters not ordained to offer Mass and Confession, but merely installed "to preside over the assembly of the people" in the invalid Novus Ordo.
This new wave of anti-Catholic secularization on the part of Bergoglio is starting, not unexpectedly, from the religious order to which he himself belongs, the Newjesuits. These are the same who, in Bergoglio's native Latin American, embrace liberation theology (i.e., carry a rifle and shoot those conservative politicians), secular socialism, and even outright Communism. The Newjesuits were devastating exposed by the noted author-priest Malachi Martin, who got out of the order that went crazy during the Vatican II period and afterward.
Here is just the latest example involving St. Ignatius Church on the campus of the Newjesuits' University of San Francisco, California. The beautiful Italian Renaissance and Baroque structure, modeled on the basilicas of Rome, was dedicated in 1914, so will be celebrating its centenary next year. It doubles as a Newparish for the Newarchdiocese under Newarchbishop Salvatore Cordileone, the notorious "Drunk" Newbishop, because he was picked up falling-down drunk while driving his mother and another presbyter, just months before he was to be "installed" as Newarchbishop of San Francisco. The man didn't have the Christian sense to resign on the spot.
In November 2013, Bergoglio's Newjesuits and Cordileone ripped out St. Ignatius' pews. Pews are despised by the Modernists, who do not want people to kneel to God, even though this is the Biblical requirement: "That in the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of those that are in heaven, on earth, and under the earth" (Philippians 2:10/DRV). Most Protestant sects will never kneel to the Lord: they sit or stand only. In particular, the New Order sect denigrates God in the Blessed Sacrament, which it doesn't have because of its invalid New Order Mess. Therefore, there is no reason to keel, as the New Order sect's "eucharist" is a mere cookie, the same as the Protestants have.
Bergoglio's Newjesuits justified the sacrilege on the basis that the church needed more room for "social gatherings," but did not need space for the worshippers of God to kneel. They couldn't pray anyway, with all the noise from the "social gatherings" sacrilegiously taking place in what falsely claims to be God's house. Already in 2010, the Newjesuits had ripped out the confessionals and replaced them with an art gallery.
Good Catholics, the Babylonian king Baltasar saw the handwriting on the wall, predicting the Fall of Babylon. Newchurch's Neocons and pseudo-traditionalists had better see the hand of Bergoglio writing the plans for his anti-Catholic church and get out now. Benedict-Ratzinger's phony New Order "Latin Mess" isn't going to do them any good at all. It is, as wel have always said, just a Great Hoax, intended to deceive.
Dear TRADITIO Fathers:
What is going on with conservative Novus Ordoite Patrick Buchanan, former U.S. Presidential candidate and frequent political commentator and author? Recently Buchanan has come out highly critical of Francis-Bergoglio and the U.S. Newbishops for replacing proselytizing and the salvation of souls with 21st-century touchy-feely "sensitivity." Buchanan concludes that Bergoglio's neutrality means loss of the culture war. Yet Buchanan remains wed to this anti-Catholic Newpope.
The cradle Irish Catholic Buchanan is reportedly partial to the Half New Order Vatican II "Mess of 1962+," but has never shown any real interest in becoming a traditional Catholic. Why is it that he and so many other supposedly intelligent "conservative" Newchurchers, like U.S. Supreme Court Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas, television personalities Bill O'Reilly and Sean Hannity, seem so incapable of discovering what many traditional Catholics were able to see coming since the late 1960s and early 1970s, thanks to the timely warnings about the pernicious effects of Vatican II preached by such holy men as Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, Fr. Gommar DePauw, and Fr. Francis Fenton, to name only three.
The TRADITIO Fathers Reply.
The answer appears to be that Buchanan and other supposedly "conservative" Newchurchers lack the cardinal moral virtue of courage. They talk and write books, but in their actions they fall short of their self-proclaimed Catholicism. In the end, they cling to corrupt individuals rather than to God in the Person of Our Lord Jesus Christ. They console themselves with a phony "Extraordinary Mess" that came from the pen of the same Freemason presbyter, Hannibal Bugnini, who introduced the invalid New Order service of 1969.
We also have a suspicion that, in the end, these people are more interested in human respect than in God's. They still have ambition to be public figures, and they are afraid that if they proclaimed that they were true Catholics, they would be vilified and shunned by their political comrades in the secular political conservative movements. They might lose their lucrative television commentary jobs and their book deals.
If it wasn't clear before, it certainly is now. Francis-Bergoglio's mission as Newpope is to destroy what little remains of Catholicism in his New Order sect. In April 13, 2013 he appointed a Privy Council of eight cardinals to run his Newchurch for him. Now one of his Privy Councillors has shown what the role of that Council will be: to destroy the dogmata of the Catholic Church.
The aptly-named Reinhard MARX, Newcardinal of Munich, proclaimed on November 9, 2013, that he rejects the Catholic dogmata of Purgatory and Hell, in spite of the fact that both are dogmata of the Catholic Church and are taught in the Bible. In fact, the dogma of Hell is taught by Jesus Christ dozens of times in the New Testament. "Fear ye him who, after hath killed, hath power to cast into Hell" (Luke 12:5/DRV), for example, and "Depart from me, you cursed, into everlasting fire" (Matthew 25:41/DRV).
Like the Modernist/Liberalist Protestants, MARX acknowledges only Heaven, like a Christian spa for both the evil and the good dead. Bergoglio picked this heretic to represent Europe. MARX is also the Chairman of the Commission of the Bishops' Conferences of the European Union, and in the spring of 2014 is a contender for the presidency of the German Bishops' Conference.
Yes, Bergoglio's Newcardinal MARX preaches the heresy of Universal Salvation. But MARX doesn't stop with heresy. He wants Newchurch to "repent" -- not for its sin for apostatizing from the Catholic Faith, but because it taught the Biblical doctrine of Purgatory and Hell.
The Supreme Court of Italy has ruled that [New]vatican Radio, part of the new "Vatican Information Services" conglomerate, is damaging the health of children. The court was referring to the physical health of children, but we know that, of course, the damage to the spiritual health of children by means of the New Order sect's anti-Catholic propaganda is far worse.
The nearby town of Cesano had sued Francis-Bergoglio as a carcinogen because of his radio tower's illegal high-powered transmitters. In 2001, health authorities determined that electromagnetic radiation spewed out by Newvatican was above the legal limit and that children in the area were consequently six times more likely to develop leukaemia, a cancer of the blood. The 300-page report prepared by Italy's most prestigious cancer research hospital called the connection between Newvatican's antennae and childhood cancer "coherent and significant."
Known for despising the health of children, the First Paedophile Newpope, JPII-Wojtyla; the Second Paedophile Newpope, Benedict-Ratzinger; and the Third Paedophile Newpope, Francis-Bergoglio, have all ignored the serious 2001 medical report and have continued to spew forth their deadly broadcasts over the last twelve years. Now the Supreme Court of Italy has held the Newpopes to account.
Good Catholics, what was Bergoglio's response? Not: I'm sorry that I didn't turn off my broadcasts that were killing children. No, his response through his officials was that he was "disappointed by the ruling." Once again "Mr. Humble" is exposed as a self-serving hypocrite who thinks that his silly "homilies" are more important to spew out than saving the lives of children. After decades of Newchurch's participation in rape, sodomy, and sexual assault against children and their cover-up, why should we be suprised? These Newpopes haven't a drop of Catholic morality left in them.
(We deliberately withhold the name of the Newchurch diocese and parish involved, because we TRADITIO Fathers have received reports of similar occurrences around the world. Thus, we are generalizing the nature of this report.)
On November 17, 2013, the "Motu" Mess, sometimes erroneously termed the "Extraordinary Mess," was cancelled at our Newparish, so the report goes. This was the only "Motu" Mess in our entire Newchurch diocese. The presbyter-pastor at the site announced to us:
The Extraordinary Form of the Mass [sic] ... always was envisioned as a means to serve a community that could support itself and inspire the local church, in and through this Mass form. For these most recent years, our parish has made an effort to provide a support for this form.... After four years, the community praying in the Extraordinary Form has not developed into a stable community, not only able to support itself in ministry and stewardship, but also at contributing to the parish as a whole.
Recognizing this fact, I entered into a discussion with the diocese regarding our efforts, and it was agreed that, in spite of our worthy effort, we would end the Latin Mass here. Accordingly, the last Sunday-scheduled Extraordinary Form of the Mass will be on November 17th at 1 p.m. As was always the hope too, we hope (and want) our brothers and sisters who have celebrated the Mass in this form to now participate in any of our other six [Novus Ordo] Sunday Masses a weekend.
In response to the presbyter's statement, one former participant at the Mess described how the "Motu" Mess perpetrated by Benedict-Ratzinger was a hoax from the beginning. He wrote:
Even in the best of times, when we had willing priests [sic] who had respect for this rite, there was never any effort on the part of the clergy to promote the Extraordinary Form [sic] to the rest of the parish, or even to educate people about it.... There was never any attempt to create or support an integral Catholic devotional life centered on this liturgy -- or even an awareness that such a thing exists.... [The 'Motu' Mess] was always treated as a pastoral concession to a tiny special-interest group, with entirely predictable results. The latest administrative shuffle resulted in an extremely liberal priest who could barely disguise his contempt.... Even minimal traces of Catholicism disappeared from the homilies.
The former participant in this case, together with many others, got smart. They realized that the city had long been home to a small independent traditional Catholic chapel, where independent traditional Catholic priests (not Novus Ordo presbyters) had offered not the Half Novus Ordo Vatican II "Motu" Mess of Ratzinger, but the real Traditional Latin Mass of 1950.
Good Catholics, this experience with Ratzinger's phony "Motu" Mess, fabricated by the Freemason presbyter Hannibal Bugnini and just seven years later turned into the Full-blown New Order Protestant-Masonic-Pagan service of 1969, which Ratzinger declared the "Ordinary Rite" of Newchurch, has been repeated worldwide. Ignorant pseudo-traditionalists were snookered into the New Order sect by the promise of a phony "Latin Mess," performed by unordained Novus Ordo presbyters, not priests traditionally ordained by traditional Catholic bishops. Now these pseudo-traditionalists are beginning to realize that Ratzinger played them for fools, and many of them are now getting out of the anti-Catholic New Order sect, currently led by Francis-Bergoglio.
Dominico Bartolucci was ordained a priest of the Catholic Church in 1939 and became the Director of the Sistine Chapel Choir when it was still Catholic. He took up that post in 1956 under Pope Pius XII and ended his service in 1997, after the once-Sacred Liturgy had been corrupted by the Modernist Vatican II Council (1962-1965). Bartolucci entered upon his priesthood when the Church was still Catholic and fostered true Sacred music: Gregorian Chant and Sacred Polyphony. Now Newpapal Messes are a joke, as well as being invalid, replete with tom-toms and kazoos. No Newpope after Vatican II has ever performed even the Half Novus Order Mess of 1962+.
Bartolucci had held several positions in Sacred Music, most especially as Director of the Chapel Choir of the Duomo Cathedral in Florence, Italy, before becoming Deputy Director of the Sistine Chapel Choir in 1952 upon the personal recommendation of another leading light of Sacred Music, the director and composer Lorenzo Perosi. When Perosi died in 1956, Pope Pius XII appointed Bartolucci Permanent Director of that choir. Bartolucci served in that capacity until his retirement in 1997. He was an illustrious composer and musician, who exercised his traditional Catholic Faith through Sacred Music. He composed Masses, motets, organ music, as well as symphonies, madrigals, and chamber music.
Bartolucci was also Director of the Accademia Nationale di Santa Cecilia. He was recognized as a leading interpreter of the Renaissance Catholic composer Giovanni Pierluigi da Palestrina, the composer who is said to have saved Sacred Polyphony at the Council of Trent by means of his sublime Missa Papae Marcelli. He conducted worldwide concerts of Sacred Music, including one in Russia.
Bartolucci found in Pope John XXIII a great supporter of Sacred Music and Bartolucci's resuscitation of the Sistine Chapel Choir. This, by the way, is more evidence that Pope John was quite traditional, not the Modernist that he is often portrayed as. During the Modernist Vatican II Council, Bartolucci was a respected and outspoken advocate for retaining fully the Latin language in the Sacred Liturgy. The motto of this traditional cardinal was "Psallam Deo Meo" [I shall sing to my God]. A better epitaph could not be found for this great man of Sacred Music, who was a courageous proponent for traditional Catholicism at Vatican II.
Resistance to Francis-Bergoglio's anti-Catholicism has now broken out into the open. Traditional Catholics openly challenged Bergoglio by disrupting one of the events that he and Jewish leaders had led in the Metropolitan Newcathedral in Buenos Aires, Argentina, each year while he was Newarchbishop there from 1998 to 2013. The event was a syncretistic (called "interfaith" in the New Order) ceremony, traditionally condemned by the Catholic Church. The conference were specifically staged to take place on the anniversary of the beginning of what is commonly called the World War II Holocaust, specifically 1938's Kristallnacht.
The annual syncretistic ceremony included Newchurchers, Protestants, and Jews. Holocaust-worship is a "doctrine" of the New Order sect. When traditional Catholic bishop Richard Williamson dared to ask a question about this disputed point of secular history during a Swedish press interview, Benedict-Ratzinger came down on him like a tonne of bricks. Ratzinger had himself committed the sin of sacrilege against the First Commandment of God several times by participating in rituals at Jewish synagogues.
It seems that some traditional Catholics have had enough of Holocaust-worship in supposedly Catholic churches. At the November 12, 2013, syncretistic Newcathedral ceremony, a group of traditional Catholics, outraged that a rabbi was presiding over a ceremony in a once-Catholic cathedral, raised their voices in saying the Rosary and the Pater Noster. The usually-pacifist Newchurch syncretists at the ceremony attacked the traditional Catholics in order to get them to stop praying. Bergoglio's successor as Newarchbishop, Mario Poli, vilified the traditional Catholics from the Newcathedral's pulpit by calling them "intolerant." Bergoglio himself has called them "doctrinaire" and "idealogues." Yet even the Novus Ordo Mess is not allowed to be celebrated in a synagogue or mosque.
Bergoglio has shown no interest in traditional Catholics. He has disparaged even \traditionalist groups as being out of touch with the Newchurch of the New Order. [Some information for this Commentary was contributed by the Associated Press.]
When on July 7, 2007, Benedict-Ratzinger foisted off on pseudo-traditionalists the Half New Order Vatican II "Motu" Mess of 1962+, sometimes erroneously termed the "Extraordinary Mess," Daniel DiNardo, Newarchbishop of Houston, Texas, now the newly-elected Vice President of the U.S. Conference of Catholic [Sic] Bishops, was one of the first to reject it. Elected on November 12, 2013, DiNardo had published a letter on July 20, 2007, explaining why Houston, one of the largest Newarchdioceses in the United States, would be rejecting the "Motu" Mess:
It must be admitted, as the Holy [Sic] Father himself writes, that there are not many who have the formation in Latin to understand the older forms. That would also include many of our priests [sic]. Further, a large number of our priests have never celebrated the older rite. Finally, the multiple celebrations of the Eucharist on Sunday in our parishes already due to our growing population and the number of Masses on weekends that our pastors and priests are already celebrating creates a series of "logistical" issues for many, if not most, of our parishes.
DiNardo could not, of course, reject the "Motu" Mess publicly in the face of the "Holy" Father (actually, the Second Paedophile Newpope, Benedict-Ratzinger), so he clothed his anti-traditionalism on purportedly practical grounds:
Mass [sic] is already celebrated in 14 or more languages each weekend in our archdiocese. In addition, there are 5 different Eastern Rites in our archdiocesan territory: the Ruthenian Byzantine, Ukrainian Byzantine, Maronite, Syro-Malabar and Syro-Malankara, plus a chapel of the Melkite Byzantine Rite, as well as occasional celebrations of the Ethiopian Rite by one of our priests [sic] for some members of that Eastern Rite community. Finally there is a parish of what is called "Anglican Rite Usage," for those Catholics [sic] who have come to us from the Anglican communion. We have incredible variety.
In any case, we TRADITIO Fathers have consistently pointed out that the Half Novus Ordo "Motu" Mess of 1962+ is a fraud. It is the Vatican II Mess fabricated by the Freemason presbyter Hannibal Bugnini, which just seven years later was easily morphed into the Full-blown Novus Ordo Mess of 1969.
DiNardo is, moreover, a Protestant in a Newbishop's clothing. He sacrilegiously turned his Novus Ordo cathedral of the Sacred Heart into a site for the "ordination" of several Protestant Methodist priestesses. On May 28, 2013, Protestant Methodist bishopess Janice Riggle Huie, at the United Methodist Church's Annual Texas Conference, "ordained" several priestesses in DiNardo's Newchurch cathedral. No word has emanated from Francis-Bergoglio or his Newvatican condemning the "ordinations" by a heretic bishopess in a New Order temple. In fact, he seems to approve!
Good Catholics, this is just more handwriting on the wall for the demise of the pseudo-traditionalists who have not shunned the New Order sect, but perform the "Extraordinary Mess" in that sect's temples. Now the U.S. Newbishops' Vice President, and presumptive next President in three years, is a sworn anti-traditionalist and Protestant sympathizer!
That the Francis-Bergoglio regime is merely playing games with the pseudo-traditionalists attached to the Half Novus Ordo "Motu" Mess of 1962+ was clearly demonstrated again when two of his officials gave conflicting statements about Bergoglio's stance against traditional Catholicism.
The higher of the two officials making a statement was Newcardinal Kurt Koch, the President of Bergoglio's Council for Promoting Christian Unity. In Newvatican's official newspaper, L'Osservatore Romano, of November 12, 2013, Koch denounced the pseudo-traditionalists as "extremists" for holding that the Modernist Vatican II Council was a "rupture" from the Church rather than as "part of the living tradition" of the Church.
Newcardinal Koch's denunciation of pseudo-traditionists in Newvatican's newspaper came just one day after a contradictory statement by long-retired Newcardinal Dario Hoyos, held in disgrace after his direct involvement in Newchurch's Great Sex & Embezzlement Holocaust. Hoyos had been fired by Benedict-Ratzinger as head of the "Ecclesia Dei" Commission on July 2, 2009, after having been exposed as a major player in Newchurch's cover-up of its paedophile Newbishops and presbyters. He subsequently stated that he was merely following the orders of the Second Paedophile Pope, Benedict-Ratzinger. In disgrace, Hoyos was denied permission to perform a "Motu" Mess at the National Shrine of the Immaculate Conception in Washington, D.C.
On November 11, 2013, Hoyos claimed in responding to questions from Una Voce International, a pseudo-traditionalist group, that Bergoglio had no "negative judgment" on the "Motu" Mess. It should be carefully noted that the disgraced Hoyos was pandering to a small group of pseudo-traditionalists, who wanted to hear that message. Hoyos is well-known for playing up to these groups. Koch's statement, on the other hand, is considered representative of Bergoglio's own stance and was made in Bergoglio's official newspaper. [Some information for this Commentary was contributed by Catholic World News.]
When the Newchurch of the New Order, born at the Modernist Vatican II Council in 1962, pursued the vulgarization of the Traditional Latin Mass, it opened a Pandora's box of evils that has persisted to the present day, sixty years later. In 1962, it had seen introduction of the Half Novus Ordo Mess of 1962 -- the same Modernist Mess that Benedict-Ratzinger in 2007 would shockingly proclaim the "Extraordinary Mess" of Newchurch, an unCatholic term that had never been used before in the history of the Church. The Freemason presbyter, Hannibal Bugnini, who was the chief architect of the New Order "Liturgy," had fabricated the Half Novus Ordo Vatican II Mess of 1962 and used it to foist off on Newchurch just seven years later, his invalid Full-blown Novus Ordo Mess of 1969.
The new "translations" are those issued by the notorious International Committee on English in the [Novus Ordo] Liturgy. The ICEL was responsible for replacing the Latin with awful English "translations," which still ring in the ears of Newchurchers. The national Newbishops' conferences are empowered to adapt or add prayers; to change the order of parts; to omit rites, like the joining of the hands of the spouses or the giving of rings; and to incorporate local customs, like swinging and swaying. Once Newchurch introduced the vulgar tongues in place of the Sacred Latin, "translation" was used as an excuse to suppress the Catholic Mess and "sacraments." Using the excuse of "translation," the Modernists were able to introduce into their Protestant-Masonic-Pagan service any number of heresies.
In the United States, for example, several phony "translations" had been introduced, until in 2011 the latest one was openly resisted by Newchurch laity and clergy as "too conservative." Some presbyters openly refused to use the new "translation" and concocted home brews of their own. On November 1, 2013, a new study by the Diekmann Center for Patristics and Liturgical Studies indicated that a majority of Newchurchers want no more "translations." Nonetheless, the U.S. Conference of Catholic [Sic] Bishops will vote on further changes on November 12, 2013.
Now the juggernaut of vulgar tongues continues in new "translations" for matrimony and confirmation. Matrimony, like Baptism, is a Sacrament that does not, in an emergency, require a priest. The spouses confer the Sacrament upon each other by their public vows. In 1971 Newchurch already abolished the Sacrament of Confirmation by invalidating its form and matter and replacing it with a Protestant rite that confirms nothing but membership in a club.
And it isn't just English that is the culprit. Germany's Newchurch bishops voted in September 2013 to table indefinitely a series of new "translations" made into their language. What is more, the Newbishops are so inefficient that it has taken them 22 years to complete the Novus Ordo 1991 Latin edition. In the meantime, a new third edition was released in 2002. Work on "translating" this into vulgar tongues has not even begun. [Some information for this Commentary was contributed by the National Catholic Register.]
Good Catholics, there is a reason that divine Providence and the Church has as the arbiter and communicator of the Catholic Church the Sacred Latin Language. Pope Pius XII was absolutely right when he prophesied: "The day the Church abandons her universal tongue [Latin] is the day before she returns to the catacombs." This papal prophesy has come true with the advent of the Newchurch of the New Order in 1962.
Bergoglio's Newchurch, it turns out, is generally too ignorant to speak Latin, or even to read it. Why should we be surprised? Bergoglio doesn't seem to be able to teach Catholic theology -- in any language, let alone Latin! Now Bergoglio's Newvatican has announced plans to vulgarize the venerable Latinitas journal founded by Pope Pius XII in 1953 to further Latin as a living language. Instead, the "modernized" Latinitas will not promote Latin as a living language, as Pope Pius had XII intended, but become just another one of those plenitudinous "academic" journals focusing on on literature, philosophy, history, and science, and will include, for the first time, articles in vulgar tongues.
On November 8, 2013, the head of the Academia Latinitatis announced that no longer would the journal bearing the name of the Latin language be entirely in Latin. Vulgar tongues will, for the first time in sixty years, be introduced into the journal. This move paralleled what happened when Hannibal Bugnini, the chief architect of the New Order "liturgy," introduced in the early 1960s vulgar tongues into the Latin liturgical journal that he edited in Rome. Within a year or two, Catholics were deprived of the Traditional Latin Mass and forced to worship at an vernacularized and invalid Novus Ordo service or get out. As a consequence, about one-third did get out of the Novus Ordo sect and out of its Protestant-Masonic-Pagan Mess in the immediately ensuing years.
Even many traditional Catholics are unaware that the Modernist Vatican II Council was conducted entirely in Latin by the personal decree of Pope John XXIII. Although he was requested to allow simultaneous translation into vulgar tongues, that pope absolutely refused, proclaiming that any Catholic bishop should be able to read, write, and speak the Latin language. In fact, on February 22, 1962, in a most solemn ceremony before the Cardinals assembled, John XXIII promulgated the Apostolic Constitution Veterum sapientia - On the Promotion of the Study of Latin, requiring that any priest to be ordained must have studied Latin for at least seven years and be able to read, write, and speak the Sacred Language. For further information, click on LATNECES: Necessity of Latin for the Roman Catholic Church, From the writings of Roman Catholic Saints, Popes, and Theologians in the TRADITIO Network's Library of Files (FAQs and Traditional Apologetics) department.
In his 1962 Apostolic Constitution, John XXIII also confirmed once and for all the Apostolic Tradition that Latin was to remain the language of the Church and the language of the Roman liturgy. It was the Modernists who took over the Council while the pope was dying of cancer who took steps to fabricate a vulgar New Order Mess. John XXIII never signed the Modernistic liturgy constitution and on his deathbed is reported to have called for the cancellation of the Council, which had gone off the rails and rejected the pope's original purpose. For further information, click on FAQ8: What Is the Authority of Vatican II? in the TRADITIO Network's Library of Files (FAQs and Traditional Apologetics) department.
Even most of the Newcardinal ignoramuses of the New Order sect are too ignorant to know the Church's language. When Benedict-Ratzinger in February 2013 announced his abdication, he addressed the Newcardinals in Latin, one uneducated Newcardinal asked an adjoining Newcardinal, "What did he say?" The other Newcardinal answered, "He said that he's abdicating." The first Newcardinal then replied, "No, you must not have understood!" Most of the international press was also too ignorant to understand the international Latin language and missed the story. However, a veteran from the Italian News Agency ANSA, who was proficient in Latin, broke the story before anyone else! [Some information for this Commentary was contributed by Agence France-Presse.]
The Newcardinal of Naples, Italy, has proclaimed that "those who pollute" are to be denied the (invalid) Novus Ordo cookie. Crescenzio Sepe claimed to journalists on November 6, 2013: "Those who pollute" cannot take the cookie. Why? "Because they do not enjoy God's 'grace,'" alleges Sepe. [Some information for this Commentary was contributed by the Italian News Agency ANSA.]
Of all the grave sins that would deny someone "communion," the "crime" of pollution would probably appear on no one's list. Newchurch clergy raping children would probably appear on everyone's list, but Sepe never mentioned that grave sin. Nor has either JPII-Wojtyla, Benedict-Ratzinger, or Francis-Bergoglio deprived any of their paedophile Newclergy of the Novus Ordo cookie. No, not one.
Good Catholics, this is just the latest proof that the Newchurch of the New Order is not a religion, but a political party, lightly veiled with a little phony "religiousity" to deceive. Sepe made his remarks in connection with the annual meeting of the radical environmentalist political group Greenaccord being held at Castel dell'Ovo in Naples.
Dear TRADITIO Fathers:
I have never understood the meaning of the Glory Be prayer, which ends with the phrase "world without end." Can you help?
The TRADITIO Fathers Reply:
The English phrase "world without end" appears in the King James Version and Douay-Rheims Version of St. Paul's Letter to the Ephesians 3:21. The words appear to be an infelicitous and puzzling rendition, apparently by the heretic King Henry VIII, of what is quite clear in the Latin per omnia saecula saeculorum, literally: "throughout all the ages of the ages." In saecula saeculorum is a Hebraism denoting a superlative quality. The same usage is seen in such expressions as Rex Regum (King of Kings) and Dominus Dominorum (Lord of Lords). The expression may be intended as a nominative absolute in English, meaning "as long as the world (secular ages) have not ended."
Good Catholics, this is just another one of those difficulties introduced by "translations" of the Sacred Languages into the vulgar tongues. Catholics should be saying these prayers in Latin anyway. Even Vatican II (Sacrosanctum Concilium Sec. 36.1) required that Newchurchers be able to say the Pater Noster, Gloria Patri, etc., in Latin. Quiz your Novus Ordo friends on this one! They'll all flunk even the phony Vatican II "Catholicism" that they claim to follow.
On November 5, 2013, the Illinois State Legislature approved "gay marriage" for that state, specifically citing Francis-Bergoglio's anti-Catholic statement that he could not "judge same-sex couples." It seems clear that Bergoglio's anti-Catholic position gave Newchurchers just the cover that they needed to recognize this abomination, which is contrary to God's Natural Law, as well as to the established moral theology of the Catholic Church. This was just the latest instance of the horror that Bergoglio's anti-Catholic regime has effected.
Governor Pat Quinn said that he intends to sign the bill, which would take effect June 1, 2014. After more than a year of intense lobbying, during which opponents of the immoral practice argued that doing so would unravel the foundation of society, moralists were finally done in by Bergoglio. Illinois's immoral enactment was quickly praised by Barack Obama, who advocates abortion, contraception, and homosexuality.
Until Bergoglio made his anti-Catholic statement, the prospects for the recognition of "gay marriage" in Illinois were considered dim. Advocates specifically cited "help from [New]pope Francis, who warned that the Catholic Church could lose its way by focusing too much on social stances, including opposition to homosexuality." They quoted Bergoglio's July 2013 anti-Catholic statement to the international press: "If a person is gay and seeks God and has good will, who am I to judge him?" Liberalist Newcardinal Francis George, of Chicago, Illinois, showed some surprising courage, publicly disagreeing with Bergoglio's anti-Catholic stance. [Some information for this Commentary was contributed by the Chicago Tribune.]
Good Catholics, what is Bergoglio's next anti-Catholic stunner going to be: approval of polygamy, of sex with horses, of paedophilia? Bergoglio has become so demented that no insanity in the future should surprise us. It might surprise Newchurchers that the teaching of the Catholic Church is that they must separate themselves from such a pope. The noted Jesuit moral theologian Francisco Suarez (1548-1617), named by Pope Paul V the Most Exalted and Pious, declared:
If [the pope] gives an order contrary to right customs, he should not be obeyed; if he attempts to do something manifestly opposed to justice and the common good, it will be lawful to resist him (De Fide, Disputatio X, Sectio VI, Numerus 16)
Showing further the horrific corruption that Francis-Bergoglio has unleashed on his New Order sect, the superior of his religious order in Italy has been arrested for conjuring up fictitious charges against two members of his congregation to prevent them voting against him at his election. Presbyter Renato Salvatore, General Superior of the Camilliani order, which is supposed to be dedicated to caring for the sick, was arrested along with five other people accused of helping carry out the Machiavellian scheme, according to Italian police.
On the basis of trumped up charges, the New Order group essentially kidnapped two innocent members of their order to prevent them from taking part in the election, held in May 2013, and to rig the vote outcome. [Some information for this Commentary was contributed by Agence France-Presse.]
Good Catholics, Francis-Bergoglio has remained silent in the face of horrific corruption in his New Order sect. While he poses as "Mr. Humble" in public and kisses babies for the cameras, he is in reality is a socialist/communist Modernist who advocates anti-Catholic positions and works to destroy what little remains of Catholicism in the Newchurch of the New Order.
Stanislaw Dziwisz was JPII-Wojtyla's most intimate associate. He served Wojtyla for 13 years when Wojtyla was Newarchbishop of Krakow, Poland, and then moved with Wojtyla into the Apostolic Palace, where he shared the secrets of that 26-year Newpapacy. When Wojtyla died, Dziwisz was purportedly paid off with a Newcardinalate to keep him silent about Wojtyla's connections with paedophiles, particularly the most notorious of the lot, Marcial Maciel, the founder and head of the Legionaries of Christ, to whom Wojtyla gave very public honors and personal access.
In 2004 Wojtyla publicly met with the paedophile Maciel, praised him, and blessed him. Dziwisz, in a book released in November 2013, stated flatly: Wojtyla "should not have received that individual." Maciel had been sodomizing with abandon Newseminarians, raping and men, women, and children, even his own illegitimate children, whom he had the gall to present to Wojtyla at Newrome.
Dziwisz admits the widespread belief that Wojtyla "did not do enough to protect victims and punish guilty" presbyters. Dziwisz tries in his book to shift some of the blame for the moral corruption of the Wojtyla Newpapacy by indicating that his "partner in crime," Newcardinal Josef Ratzinger, was complicit in the cover-up of "this horrible plague." In an age when heads of organizations are expected to take public responsibility for what is done in their administrations, Dziwisz shows that Wojtyla was an incompetent ignoramus rather than anything approaching a "saint." [Some information for this Commentary was contributed by the U.K. Catholic Herald.]
Good Catholics, the fact that Francis-Bergoglio, the Third Paedophile Newpope, has announced that he will con-anize the First Paedophile Newpope, Wojtyla, tells you all you need to know about how Newvatican and its Newpapacy have become, in Our Lord's most apt denunciation: "like to whited sepulchres, which outwardly appear to men beautiful but within are full of dead men's bones and of all filthiness, [who] also outwardly indeed appear to men just: but inwardly ... are full of hypocrisy and iniquity" (Matthew 23:27-28/DRV).
Spanish and American media report that Trinity College-Dublin's Linda Hogan is in line to become the New Order sect's first female Newcardinal. Hogan is a professor there, not of physics, history, or Classics, but of "oecumenics," whatever in the heck that is. Hogan is described as a "feminist." The Spanish newspaper El Pais was the first to report that Bergoglio again wanted to shake up a Newchurch already reeling with seven months of his anti-Catholic words and actions.
Although originally men did not have to be priests to be appointed cardinals, John XXIII in 1962 required that they become bishops, if they were not already. The only exceptions since then have been men over the age over 80 years of age, who under the New Order's rules cannot vote in a Newconclave to elect a Newpope. Hogan is only 49 years of age.
Bergoglio has announced a consistory to appoint new Newcardinals on February 22, 2014. Hogan could be his first "scarlet lady," a title that has a dubious ring because of the Hawthorne classic, or could even become the first "popessa" of the New Order sect. [Some information for this Commentary was contributed by the Irish Times.]
Good Catholics, it was antics like this on the part of the heretic Anglican Archbishop of Canterbury, Rowan Williams, with his "gay bishops" and bishopesses that drove the Anglican sect into open schism with traditionalist Anglicans. It might well be a good thing for Bergoglio to appoint Hogan. Maybe that would be abominable enough for the pseudo-traditionalsts to get some backbone and leave the New Order sect for the unCatholic fraud that it is!
Showing that Francis-Bergoglio's anti-Catholicism is spreading in Newchurch, the new U.S. Ambassador to Newvatican has inaugurated his appointment with a speech denouncing Newchurchers who criticize funding pro-abortion groups. Hackett ought to know. He was the head of one such group, Catholic [Sic] Relief Services, which immorally promotes abortion and contraception.
On October 21, 2013, Hackett presented his credentials to Bergoglio. Four days later he was attacking groups who objected to his funding of pro-abortion and pro-contraception groups against Catholic doctrine and God's Natural Law. His comments about Newchurch pro-lifers were described as "less than diplomatic." Hackett indicated no concern about criticisms that he was "giving cover to an administration [Barack Obama's] considered by some as hostile" to traditional moral teaching. Obama is an unabashed supporter of funding abortion, contraception, and "gay marriage."
Prominent groups in Newchurch, such as the American Life League, sharply criticized Hackett for funding, when he was head of the so-called "Catholic" Relief Services, of pro-abortion groups. From Catholic Relief Services, which prominently features the word "Catholic" in its title and puts itself out as a nonprofit group, Hackett skimmed out of over 300,000 U.S. dollars in each of the years 2011 and 2010 for his services. Some of that money he spent on the political campaign of Barack Obama, after Obama "made clear that that he is waging a war against babies and the Catholic [Sic] Church." [Some information for this Commentary was contributed by Life Site News.]
It seems that Newpope Francis-Bergoglio doesn't know how his Newchurch should respond to the worldwide moral crisis. So, he is going to take the coward's way out by taking a worldwide poll. The topics on which local Newchurchers are to weight in are, inter alia:
Catholic teaching is clear on these issues, but Bergoglio has shown himself to be no Catholic.
The poll was sent out in mid October 2013 to every national conference of Newbishops with a request from Newvatican to send it to Newparishes for their "input." Bergoglio has pledged publicly to move away from what he called a "Vatican-centric" approach. Others call Bergoglio's approach an "anti-Catholic-centric" approach. In fact, this is the approach used by non-Fundamentalist Protestant denominations, in which clergy and laity essentially vote on doctrine and morality. The Anglican sect, for example, has voted in abortion, fornication, contraception, and "gay marriage."
In England and the United States, the Newbishops already posted the poll online on October 31, 2013. Thus, there is no security in the data submitted. No one will know whether the submitter is a Newchurcher or a Protestant, Jew, Mohammedan, pagan, or atheist. No one will know whether the "poll box" has been fraudulently "stuffed." [Some information for this Commentary was contributed by the National Catholic Reporter.]
Good Catholics, Bergoglio seems to have gotten it into his mind to dismantle what very little remains of the Catholic Church in his Newchurch of the New Order. But what else could we expect from a Modernist Marxist who hates the true Catholic Faith -- and has denounced it as "doctrinaire" and "idealogue"!
The crucifix is at the center of true Catholicism. It graphically represents the Sacrifice of Calvary. Sacrifice is not, however, something that the Newchurch of the New Order likes, because it graphically represents the consequence of the sin of the world, which Christ came to take away and open once again the possibility of Heaven. Sacrifice is not something that Protestants like either, because to them it is associated with the Sacrifice of the Mass and the priesthood, both of which Protestant heretics deny. Apparently now so does Bergoglio.
Traditionally, the papal staff is a cross. But for All Saints Day 2013, Bergoglio rolled out the monstrosity known as the "Resurrexifix," an unorthodox monstrosity featuring the "risen Christ" in place of the traditional Crucified. This antithesis became popular after the Modernist Vatican II Council (1963-1965) in the Newchurch of the New Order and in un-Fundamentalist Protestant sects. Bergoglio's new unCatholic toy was donated by -- surprise -- a financial group.
Presciently, Pope Pius XII prophesied, in his 1947 Encyclical Letter Mediator Dei, that such unCatholic items would be used in a corrupted Catholic Church ("a crucifix so designed that the divine Redeemer's body shows no trace of His cruel sufferings"). Pius XII also prophesied the use of other unCatholic abominations in a corrupted Church, when traditional Catholics were forced to "return to the catacombs": the use of tables as altars, the exclusion of black as a liturgical color for Masses for the Dead, the rejections of Sacred Polyphony, and even the abandoning of her Latin language. All of these unCatholic abominations, prophesied by Pius XII, the New Order sect has in fact implemented after the Modernist Vatican II Council, in union with the Protestant heretics.
Good Catholics, in a little over seven months, we have been able to see the many facets of Newpope Bergoglio: the New Order sectarian, the socialist/communist, the anti-traditionalist, the homophiliac, the paedophiliac, the anti-doctrinalist, and now -- the Protestant.
Milan's Panorama magazine has revealed that as part of the United States National Security Agency (NSA)'s bugging of leaders around the world, the March 2013 Newpapal conclave was bugged. Newvatican, which is known far more for lies and cover-ups than for telling God's truth, disputes the report. The NSA claims that Newvatican was not a target. But the NSA, which itself tried to cover up the truth of its worldwide bugging and eavesdropping, would hardly admit to doing something that not be bad P.R. The NSA bugged German chancelloress Angela Merkel. Why would it not bug Bergoglio?
Newvatican's internet site has been successfully attacked in the past, by the hackers' collective known as Anonymous, and bogus Twitter messages have been sent out as if coming from Benedict-Ratzinger or Francis-Bergoglio. Even Newvatican admits that the NSA could have eavesdropped on the conversations held by Newcardinals outside the apostolic palace in the days leading up to the conclave. Newvatican is also aware that it is being spied on by various external bodies. In the 1980s Czechoslovakian secret services managed to insert a bug into a statue of Mary in Secretary of State Agostino Casaroli's private study.
It is practically impossible for someone to be certain not to be listened to when a telephone call is made from Newvatican's internal platform to an external recipient. Bergoglio exceeds his predecessors in making phone calls, and all of these are buggable. [Some information for this Commentary was contributed by La Stampa.]
Newarchbishop Jose Rodriguez Carballo, Secretary of the Newchurch Congregation for Institutes of Consecrated Life and Societies of Apostolic Life, admitted in a public address on October 29, 2013, that what Newchurch calls "consecrated religious," that is monks and nuns, have been leaving the New Order sect at a rate of 3,000 each year for the last five years. Curiously, this is the sinking organization that Fellay and his Neo-SSPX wanted to become attached to -- if Benedict-Ratzinger hadn't finally pulled the plug on Fellay's desire to join the New Order sect.
Carballo, in essence, admitted that the cause of the departures from Newchurch was the "absence of spiritual life" in Newchurch groups. As a result, these Newchurch monasteries and convents have experienced a "loss in sense of community" and even of belonging to Newchurch. Curiously, Carballo comes from the Order of Friars Minor, whose occasional "Motu" Messes, sometimes erroneously termed "Extraordinary Messes" of 1962+, were suppressed by Francis-Bergoglio as part of his anti-traditional pogrom. Another cause cited by Carballo was homosexual relationships, which are "most obvious in men, but also present, more often than you think, between women," i.e., lesbians. [Some information for this Commentary was contributed by Catholic World News.]
According to the Center for Applied Research in the Apostolic, based in the pseudo-Catholic Georgetown University, of Washington, D.C., at the inauguration of the New Order in 1970, there were approximately 1,300,000 consecrated religious worldwide. In 2013, that number had sunk to a little over 900,000 -- a drop of almost one-third in a little over forty years! It seems that the much-touted New Mess, New Sacraments, New Doctrine, and New Morality became stale fast, just as traditional Catholics had predicted.
The pseudo-traditionalists, that is, those who cling to the unCatholic Newchurch of the New Order and its Great "Motu" Mess Hoax, have shot themselves in the foot. They have sold themselves out to the New Order -- and some still do, such as the Fraternity of St. Peter, the Institute of Christ the King, and the Neo-Society of St. Pius X-- and now they are left with the Modernist Newpope Benedict-Ratzinger's "Motu" Mess, fabricated by a Freemason presbyter, and they are left with Newchurch presbyters who were never ordained as priests.
Good Catholics, the pseudo-traditionalists no longer have a valid Mass or a valid priesthood. Truly they are in a spiritual Hell, devoid of any Sacramental grace. And they did it to themselves by associating themselves with the likes of the four Modernist Newpopes: Paul VI-Montini, JPII-Wojtyla, Benedict-Ratzinger, and Francis-Bergoglio.
Thank God conservative Christian pastor Kevin Swanson is not a Newchurcher. Otherwise, Francis-Bergoglio would shut him down as too "doctrinaire" and an "ideologue." Although the New Order sect in the United States hasn't mentioned it -- just as they downplay resistance to "gay marriage" -- Pastor Swanson is raising awareness of the real agenda of the Girl Scouts of America, now that the Boy Scouts have sold out to the "gay" agenda in May of 2013. Swanson fears that GSA is promoting a worldview of socialism, lesbianism, abortion, and feminist liberation theology. On his radio show, "Generations with Vision," Pastor Swanson on October 26, 2013, asked Americans to boycott the ever-present Girl Scout cookies, which even liberalists ding for another reason: their high sugar/low nutritional content.
Girl Scouts of America in fact officially describes itself as "a secular organization that refrains from teaching religious or spiritual beliefs or practices." Yet, in a duplicitous contradiction, GSA states that "the motivating force in Girl Scouting is a spiritual one." This is the contradiction of the Modern Age: embracing some non-descript touchy-feely "spirituality" without any determinate religion, let alone reference to God and His Natural Law. No wonder the girls are so confused!
To the contrary of Pastor Swanson's conservative Christianity, the U.S. Conference of Catholic [Sic] Bishops has taken a major step toward implementing Bergoglio's unCatholic homophilia. The Newbishops in their new Tier Two Training Manual now train their workers to be "alert for homophobic remarks" against what they call "gay, lesbian, bisexual, or transgendered" refugees. Conservative and traditional Catholics reject the term "homophobia" because their rejection of homosexual acts contrary to God's Natural Law is not a phobia (Greek: fear), but a principled doctrinal rejection from the New Testament. The new Newchurch manual makes no reference to moral law or the practice of virtue. Apparently, such things do not concern the Newbishops of Bergoglio's Newchurch, who claim to be Catholic, but who have become anti-Catholic in the New Order sect.
In a similar rejection of Catholic theology, at Georgetown University in Washington, D.C., which claims to be "Catholic," but is actually run by Newchurch's unCatholic Newjesuits, law school students will work with a pro-abortion advocacy group in Washington, to assist in the group's "advocacy efforts" in favor of abortion. Apparently, the pseudo-Catholic university couldn't find for its students an advocacy group against abortion to work with! [Some information for this Commentary was contributed by Catholic World News.]
Fr. Patrick Girouard's great "sin" is that he is faithful to the teachings of traditional Catholic Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, the Founder of the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX). Now that the SSPX has been taken over by Superior-Dictator Bernie Fellay and reorganized into the Neo-SSPX, Fellay is expelling all those good SSPX priests whose only "sin" is that they stand behind Archbishop Lefebvre's traditional Catholic principles, which Fellay himself has abandoned in favor of morphing his Neo-SSPX into a subsidiary New Order sect.
Fellay's modus operandi is to issue to such faithful traditional Catholic priests letters of warning, after which he expels them. Some time back, Fellay's technique worked in a few cases to intimidate traditional priests to kowtow to his own Novus Ordo learnings. But now as many as one hundred priests have given Fellay the raspberry and left him to join Bishop Richard Williamson, Fr. Joseph Pfeiffer, and others as independent Catholic priests or members of the loose association of such priests commonly called the SSPX of the Strict Observance.
On October 27, 2013, Canada's Fr. Girouard announced that he had received his first letter of warning from Fellay's Canadian agent in an effort to get Girouard out of Canada. This is another Fellay ploy: regularly transfer priests across the world so that they cannot build any loyalty with their congregations. But Fr. Girouard is not going to kowtow to the tyrannical Fellay. In fact, he says that he is going to laminate Fellay's "monition" and hang it on the wall of his office. Fr. Girouard says that he is "faithful to the Society established by the Archbishop and has never left it." However, he can no longer go along with the Neo-SSPX established under the dictatorship of Bernie Fellay and his lieutenants.
Meanwhile, the former senior bishop of the SSPX, Richard Williamson, now gone independent, in his October 26, 2013, Bulletin, lashes out at Bernie Fellay for the fall of Archbishop Lefebvre's original SSPX because:
Bishop Williamson thinks that although Fellay's Neo-SSPX will fall, the core of the Archbishop's faithful laity, will re-establish the SSPX from a position of strength, having been tested in the fire of opposition to the Novus Ordo, the "Ecclesia Dei" and "Motu" hoaxes, and the Bergoglio suppressions. That process of re-establishment is already under way.