|
|
For answers to many questions, consult the CURRENT MONTHLY REVISED EDITION of the Official Traditional Catholic Directory, Listing All Traditional Latin Masses and Traditional Resources for North America. For further information, click on the TRADITIO Network's Official Traditional Catholic Directory department, provided to the TRADITIO Network by the National Registry of Traditional Latin Masses. |
If you have you have personally benefited from the services of the TRADITIO Network, please support the continuation of the TRADITIO Network's Apostolate by clicking on the box to the left to made a donation easily, securely, and confidentially by bank account or credit card through PayPal. Regular contributors become Benefactors of the TRADITIO Network, and their intentions are specially commemorated at Traditional Latin Masses offered. Using PayPal reduces our administrative burden considerably, but if need to use a paper check, click on FAQ01: "How Can I Help the TRADITIO Network's Apostolate?" |
Subscribe to the Free TRADITIO
RSS Feed
Bruce Jenner, 1976 gold-medal Olympian decathlete, on April 24, 2015, publicly announced that he was a "trans woman." The man now claims: "I'm a woman." He can add to the distinction of being a violator of the body in the perversion called "transgendering," being a killer and a violator of the body, the Temple of the Holy Ghost, in the perversion called "transgendering." This is what the Modernist Newchurch of the New Order and Liberalist Protestantism have done. Even Evangelical Protestantism puts on blinders when it comes to bigamy, trigamy, etc. Even Francis-Bergoglio claims that in the area of perversions, "Who am I to judge?"
You may be surprised to learn that Jenner claims to be a Christian and a conservative. Here is his personal history. He married wife #1 for nine years and fathered two children by her. The same week he divorced wife #1, he married "wife: #2 and fathered two children by her. After five months of "dating," Jenner then married "wife" #3 and fathered two children by her. Six children, three mothers! This is the new Christian "family values"?!
As if his personal history couldn't get any worse, Jenner on February 7, 2015, Jenner, while fiddling with a cigarette, rear-ended another car, killing one woman and sent five children and two adults to the hospital. He is currently under investigation for vehicular manslaughter. [Some information for this Commentary was contributed by CNN.]
True Catholics, after fifty years of the Modernist Newchurch of the New Order and demented Liberalist Protestantism, what would you expect? People, even pagans, used to know right from wrong, but now right is wrong, and wrong is right. Indifferentism in religion and subjectivism in morality are the fruits. Newpopes lie, statesman lie. The only salvation remains Jesus Christ, Who proclaimed: "I am the way, and the truth, and the life" (John 14:6/DRV). Note: the truth, not the "love."
On April 26, in the 21st year of its apostolate on the internet, the TRADITIO Network logged its 24,000,000th reader. TRADITIO was the first traditional Roman Catholic site to appear on the World Wide Web and was founded on the Feastday of St. Michael the Archangel, September 29, 1994. We were here even before Newvatican was, even before Amazon.com was!
We thank the Lord for our over 24,000,000 readers over these years and for our hundreds of dedicated correspondents from all over the world, who keep us current on everything going on in the bowels of Newvatican, in the inner sancta of various traditional organizations, and at Traditional Latin Mass sites around the world. TRADITIO was determined by an Alexis-Amazon statistical survey to be the most read traditional Roman Catholic web site on the World Wide Web.
In their Daily Commentaries, the TRADITIO Fathers do not just copy news reports or the uninformed notions of johnny-come-lately "bloggers" in secular and religious publications, who in fact have very little background or understanding of the Traditional Catholic Movement. Nor is TRADITIO Network enslaved to any particular organization's viewpoint. Instead, the TRADITIO Network provides the hard-hitting, independent analysis and perspective of over half a century of Roman Catholic experience, even from before Vatican II.
The TRADITIO Network is avidly read within the highest bowels of at Newrome and Menzingen (NSSPX). In addition to the Daily Commentaries from the Fathers, including lively commentary on Church news from the traditional perspective, TRADITIO's other fifteen departments provide resources and materials for its readers to study and learn about the traditional Roman Catholic Faith.
We are particularly touched by the many thousands of messages that we have received from Newchurchers of the New Order, including Motarians, who say that they have been converted to the traditional Roman Catholic Faith because of TRADITIO's uncompromising, independent commentaries and materials. The TRADITIO Network is one of many means through which Our Lord appears be working out the Traditional Catholic Restoration of the 21st century.
You remember the famous incident related in the New Testament (Galatians 2:11), when St. Peter fell into the grave error of Judaizing and was condemned before the Apostles Assembled. Peter was at least honest enough to admit his error and recanted before the Apostles. Apparently Newpope Francis-Bergoglio learned nothing from the error of his predecessor and has committed the same grave error of Judaizing. Bergoglio's immediate predecessor, Benedict-Ratzinger, was the most grievous sinner in this regard. He frequently participated actively and publicly in Jewish synagogue services. Ratzinger's predecessor, the "Unsaint" JPII-Wojtyla, committed the same public sins.
Now the Jewish Political News Agency has announced that Francis-Bergoglio will confer the Newpapal Knighthood on Rabbi Arthur Schneier, of New York's Park East Synagogue, on April 27, 2015. It should be noted that Schneier is a public advocate of abortion. Yet Bergoglio had the gall in his decree of conferral to refer to Schneier's "service to the Church" and his "good example." Benedict-Ratzinger in 2005 had conferred the Newpapal Knighthood on Rabbi David Rosen, of the American Jewish Committee. Another infidel, another pro-abortionist.
True Catholics, Pope Gregory XVI must be turning in his grave to see the Papal Knighthood that he instituted in 1831 to recognize faithful Catholics for their signal service to the Catholic Church being turned into a travesty by its bestowal upon infidels. No wonder scandalous acts such as these have led many Catholics to question whether these men can be considered true popes and to leave the Newchurch of the New Order as being anti-Catholic.
Dear TRADITIO Fathers:
I am confused about the various feastdays of St. Joseph. Could you explain which of them are traditional and which are concocted by the New Order?
The TRADITIO Fathers Reply.
The principal feast of St. Joseph as Spouse of the Blessed Virgin Mary was entered into the Universal Roman Calendar in the late 15th century as of Simple Rite and grew in rank by 1870 to a Double Feast of the First Class, the highest rank that a feast can traditionally have. This feast, however, does not have an Octave because it falls in Lent.
One feastday for St. Joseph in the year, however, was not deemed enough to satisfy the piety of the Catholic people. In that same 18th century, a second feast of St. Joseph began to be recognized, first by the Franciscans and Carmelites, then by the Universal Church under the title "Patron Saint of the Universal Church." This second feast was set on the Wednesday after the Second Sunday of Easter ("Pastor Bonus" or "Misericordia" Sunday). This second feast is also a Double Feast of the First Class, and because it falls outside of Lent, it has a Common Octave.
The May 1 Feast of "St. Joseph the Worker" is not traditional. It was concocted by the Freemason presbyter Hannibal Bugnini, the head of "liturgy" for the nascent Newchurch and placed in the calendar in 1956, in conjunction with Communist May Day. The concocted new feast shockingly displaced on May 1 the traditional Feast of Sts. Philip & James, the Apostles of Our Lord Jesus Christ, and suppressed the traditional Feast of St. Joseph, Patron Saint of the Universal Church. The new May 1 Feast of St. Joseph the Workman ("Worker" in genderless "modernized" English) was widely reviled in the Church at the time by the highest authorities and derisively called the Feast of "Joe the Worker" or the "Pseudo-feast of San Giuseppe Comunista," as it fell on Communist May Day.
The traditional Sacred Congregation of Rites rejected Bugnini's new feast, and there was open opposition in the Church to it. Yet somehow Bugnini connived around the moribund Pius XII to get it into the calendar. Opposition to the new feast was so strong that the Congregation of Sacred Rites, the Church's most authoritative liturgical body, refused for four years to formulate the Gregorian chant Mass and Office for the feast, which were not entered into the Missale Romanum until 1960, well into the pontificate of Pope John XXIII. Traditional Catholics should celebrate the feasts of St. Joseph on March 19 and on the Wednesday after the Second Sunday of Easter (April 22 in 2015), but never the New Order pseudo-feast of "St. Joseph the Worker" on May 1.
Bishop Robert Finn, of Kansas City, Missouri, pled guilty to failing knowingly to report to police the crimes against children being perpetrated by presbyter Shawn Ratigan, a notorious paedophile who was eventually sentenced in September 2013 to 50 years for sexual assaults against children. Although Finn removed the paedophile presbyter from a pastorate, he allowed Ratigan continued access to children without supervision. The paedophile presbyter continued to use children in pornographic productions until his conviction and imprisonment.
Ironically, Finn was considered to be a "conservative" Newbishop, who did lip-service to the Half New Order Vatican II "Mess of 1962+," aka erroneously as the "Extraordinary Mess." Of the more than two dozen Newbishops in the United States personally implicated in paedophilia, the majority have been "conservative" Newbishops, not Modernlist/Liberalist Newbishops. These "conservative" Newbishops often use the "Extraordinary" Mess as a cover for their own paedophilia.
After Finn became the first Newchurch bishop to be criminally convicted for complicity in a sex crime against children on September 2012, Francis-Bergoglio took no action. Instead of getting rid of the convicted paedophiliac, Bergoglio ordered a lengthy review of Finn. Local Newchurchers were outraged. They had begun calling for Finn's resignation in May 2011 and now Bergoglio, after over a year, was taking no action, but calling for another review! An online petition asking for Bergoglio to get off his derriere and do something gathered more than 260,000 signatures.
Now, after almost three years, on April 21, 2015, Finn has resigned. Bergoglio did not fire him, nor did he impose any punishment for Finn's complicity in sexual assault against children. For all we know, Finn will be given a cushy job in Newrome with a luxurious suite of apartments and a lucrative stipend, as the "Unsaint" JPII-Wojtyla gave to paedophile-supporter Newcardinal Bernard Law, of Boston, Massachusetts.
All Newchurch officials could talk about was the need for "healing" in the Newdiocese. They refused to talk about outright firing and punishment for such paedophiliac Newbishops. They refused to talk about the fact that their 2002 "Zero Tolerance Policy" had failed, primarily because Francis-Bergoglio had refused to act against paedophiliac Newbishops. Finn himself had violated five of the 19 child-safety measures he agreed to in court and was assessed a fine of over 1,000,000 dollars for the breach, in addition to an award of 10,000,000 dollars to 47 victimized children. Finn then proceeded to charge Newparishes an additional 33 per cent assessment to pay for the increased insurance payments! The Newparishes and Newparishioners choked and called for Finn to get out. [Some information for this Commentary was contributed by the New York Times.]
True Catholics, the fact that Francis-Bergoglio allowed Finn to remain in office for almost three years after his conviction and second subsequent charge on a similar crime has angered even Newchurchers, who claim that the U.S. Newbishops' and Francis-Bergoglio's "Zero Tolerance" Policy is a fraud. Bergoglio spends millions of euros on publicity for himself as the innocent "Holy Father," whereas his hands are filthy with the corruption of children. Newchurch should bid good riddance not only to Finn, but the man to whom he reported -- none other than the "Unholy" Father Francis-Bergoglio.
There's no justice in Newchurch. That's the conclusion being reached from the latest scandal, in which a Newchurch presbyter who published a book demonstrating that Newchurch is run by a "powerful Gay Mafia" was sentenced to three months by a Newchurch kangaroo court. Ironically, Francis-Bergoglio himself made the same statement shortly after his election as Newpope.
In his book entitled Priesthood [Sic] in Crisis, Scottish presbyter Matthew Despard documented the sex crimes widespread in Newchurch's junior seminaries for decades. Despard had alerted Newchurch leaders to the crimes, but the leaders turned a deaf ear to them. As a result of his embarrassing revelations against his own Newchurch, Depsard was sentenced by a Newchurch kangaroo court to "three months in penance." Whether Newchurch would resort to the whip and thumbscrews, or the rack, to punish their own truth-teller presbyter was not immediately indicated.
Francis-Bergoglio's Newchurch bishop of Motherwell, Scotland, Joseph Toal, initiated the penal case against the presbyter, but took no action against the criminal Newclergy who had been sexually assaulting boys in their junior seminaries. Hundreds of parishioners supported the truth-telling presbyter when Newchurch's action against him was announced. Many of these walked out of a Novus Ordo "service of dismissal," never to return. Scotland's Newprimate, Newcardinal Keith O'Brien, had shortly before been forced to resign by irate Newchurers after it was revealed that he had sodomized four presbyters associated with his Newseminary. [Some information for this Commentary was contributed by the Edinburgh Herald.]
True Catholics, nothing has changed in Newchurch under Francis "Mr. Zero Tolerance" Bergoglio. His Newcardinals, Newbishops, and presbyters continue to rape children and adults with abandon. When someone speaks up -- which the new "Zero Tolerance" rules are supposed to require -- it is the presbyter who reports the crimes that is punished, not the perpetrator of the crimes. Meanwhile, Francis "The Hypocrite" makes sure that he is frequently photographed kissing children.
Those pseudo-traditionalists in Newchurch who rely on bishops consecrated before the Freemason presbyter Hannibal Bugnini's Protestantized New Ordinal of 1968 are pretty much out of luck. The number of living bishops who were consecrated bishop before 1968 now stands at 80. Even those consecrated bishop last under the pre-1968 traditional Roman Ordinal are now mostly in their late eighties. It would seem that this lot will not survive all that much longer. Only seven bishops remain who were consecrated bishop under Pius XII. Only 22 remain who were consecrated bishop under John XXIII. Newbishops in this category, by the way, now being Modernist/Liberalist bishops attached to Newchurch, would never even consider ordaining or consecrating anyone under the valid pre-1968 Ordinal.
Newchurch-approved pseudo-traditionalist groups are now receiving invalid "installations" from Novus Ordo Newbishops who were themselves consecrated. The fact that a traditional Ordinal may be used in the rare case cannot validate a priest. Rather, the Ordinal used, whether traditional or Novus Ordo, has no bearing if the bishop is not a validly-consecrated bishop himself. Newchurch-affiliated pseudo-traditional groups such as the Fraternity of St. Peter (FSSP) and Institute of Christ the King (ICR) use invalid Novus Ordo Newbishops consecrated after 1968.
One wonders what possible justification there could have been for altering the valid traditional form of the Sacrament of Holy Orders, infallibly confirmed by Pope Pius XII in Sacramentum ordinis of 1947, even one iota. What possible reason could there be for changing the form on which the Church's very legitimacy depends? What was gained by doing that, especially since it had no purely social impact and could not be justified to ensure "greater participation," or any such claptrap as that? It was done for one reason only: the Modernists and Liberalists wanted to repudiate entirely their link to the Catholic and Apostolic Church in order to found a new structure grounded in the errors of the secularist French Revolution, political Modernism/Liberalism, heretical Protestantism, and anti-Catholic Freemasonry. Thank God we have traditional Catholic bishops outside the "institutional" Newchurch of the New Order!
Remember the saga of the Transalpine Redemptorists, affiliated to Bernie Fellay's Neo-SSPX? They had been a traditional religious order, originally approved by Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre in 1987. Things were going along apace. The order even purchased its own island, Papa Stronsay off the north coast of Scotland, in 1999 and expanded to Christchurch, New Zealand, in 2007. But then Fellay began his attempted sellout to the Newchurch of the New Order under the Benedict-Ratzinger regime. In 2008, the Redemptorists decided that they couldn't wait to sell out, so they deserted Fellay and made arrangements to bend the knee to the Newchurch of the New Order.
Like all traditional organizations that have tried to go New Order -- the Fraternity of St. Peter (FSSP) being one example--, Newrome at first welcomed them with open arms, but soon stabbed them in the back. Newrome forced them to change their name and their religious habit. Then Newrome permitted them to operate only on Papa Stronsay, a tiny island of less than one square kilometre and numbering 349 souls, and Stronsay, a island of a little over 30 square kilometres and numbering 10! Newrome may be anti-Catholic and despicable morally, no one can say that it doesn't have an ironic sense of humor!
Now, the latest phase of the saga has opened. The Transalpine Redemptorists have further embraced the New Order sect. They wanted a new presbyter for themselves, so they had to get approval from Newrome. They did get it -- but with a big catch: they had to recognize the invalid, New Ordinal of 1968, fabricated by the Freemason presbyter Hannibal Bugnini on Protestant models. This Ordinal, used by Newchurch, does not ordain priests, but merely "installs presbyters/ministers to preside over the assembly of the people," as in the Protestant sects. Yes, the Transalpine Redemptorists got their Novus Ordo presbyter/minister, installed by a Novus Ordo bishop, Basil Meeking, who himself was not validly consecrated with the traditional Sacrament of Holy Orders, but merely "installed" in 1987 as a Newbishop under the invalid Protestantized New Ordinal of 1968. [Some information for this Commentary was contributed by the TRADITIO Network's Indian Correspondent.]
It is important to be aware of the fraud that is being perpetrated by such groups as the Fraternity of St. Peter (FSSP) and the Institute of Christ the King (ICR). The ordinations of these groups attached to the New Order sect's "Indult"/"Motu"/"Extraordinary" hoax are not priests, but merely Novus Ordo presbyter/ministers. The use of the traditional Ordinal does not make their ordinations valid, because their ordaining/installing Newbishops themselves are not validly consecrated under the valid traditional Sacrament of Holy Orders, merely "installed" as Newbishops under the invalid Protestantized New Ordinal of 1968. Such Newbishops have no power whosoever to consecrate priests, but only to "install presbyters to preside over the assembly of the people." Thus, FSSP, ICR, FSJV, and the like clergy are not priests, but merely Novus Ordo presbyters/ministers.
True Catholics, the lesson is: when you play with the devil that is the Newchurch of the New Order, the result has always been that you go from bad to worse. No organizations ever benefitted from an association with Newchurch. Their areas of operations are hogtied. They go from valid priests to invalid presbyter/ministers. They go from the Traditional Latin Mass to the Half New Order "Extraordinary" Mess of 1962+ or to the full-blown invalid New Mess of 1969. Sad, but they get what they deserve from making a bargain with the devil.
San Francisco, California, Newarchbishop Salvatore Cordileone is one of those Neocon "prelates" who is conservative (not traditional) on one item and Modernist/Liberalist on all the other ones. He has been getting some publicity lately for wanting his schoolteachers to exhibit conservative morals at the same time that they are supposed to be teaching Newchurch's New Morality ("Who Am I to Judge" Sodomites?, famously said Cordileone's Capo di Capo, Francis-Bergoglio). Now one hundred of Newchurch's biggest donors in the "Baghdad by the Bay" have published a full-page advertisement in the San Francisco Chronicle addressed to Bergoglio, demanding that he can his Newarchbishop.
But the TRADITIO Network got the jump on all of these johnny-come latelys when Cordileone had not yet been installed. On August 25, 2012, Cordileone was arrested for drunk driving, in which he placed the life of his own mother and a presbyter at risk. Cordileone was released later that day on a 2,500-dollar bond. Police refused to release the results of the breath test, but did admit that it was over California's 0.08 per cent legal limit. One can only imagine that it was substantial, as Cordileone wasn't even released on his own recognizance. His own mother admitted that he had had "glass after glass" of booze before he took the driver's seat of a blue 2008 Ford Taurus sedan with her and a presbyter inside. The story of Cordileone's DUI arrest captured headlines locally and nationwide.
The Newarchbishop-to-be of San Francisco was arrested, according to the police report, incognito, in a "white button-up shirt, tan pants, and brown loafers. In a carefully-crafted press campaign, Cordileone gave the postured "apology" that is now required for public officials to escape responsibility. "I feel shame for the disgrace I have brought upon the [New]church and myself," he said in his prepared statement. As with all hypocritical Newchurch clergy, Cordileone's shame did not lead him to conclude that he was unfit for installation as San Francisco's Newarchbishop. Oh, no, certainly not that! He went right ahead with his installation less than six weeks later!
When irate San Franciscans phoned the Newarchiocesan office to complain about the pending installation of a drunk as their Newarchbishop, the Communications Manager told them to "seek mental health assistance for their 'problem'" -- their "problem" being their complaint against Cordileone "The Drunk." The Communications Manager had to admit, however, that the Newarchdiocese had "been inundated with calls." [Some information for this Commentary was contributed by the Huffington Post.]
True Catholics, the Newchurch Neocons and pseudo-traditionalists will from time to time point to some isolated conservative stance by one of the Newchurch bishops, but it is all a ruse. If you look behind the propaganda, you will find that these "conservative" Newbishops are even more Modernist/Liberalist that their overt colleagues in Newchurch. It's all a Novus Ordo smokescreen that the clueless Newchurch Neocons and pseudo-traditionalists fall for every time!
If you think that Newchurch's Great Sex & Embezzlement Holocaust is abating, think again. If anything, it is worse under Francis-Bergoglio. The annual report to the U.S. Conference of Catholic [Sic] Bishops for the twelve months ending June 2014 shows that the U.S. Newchurch paid out 150,000,000 dollars to child victims for the crimes of its paedophile Newclergy. During this last year, there were 657 charges of crimes against children by Newchurch bishops and presbyters in the U.S. [Some information for this Commentary was contributed by Agence France-Presse.]
True Catholics, these figures indicate an average of three Newbishops and presbyters charged in each and every Newdiocese for just the last twelve-month period. And Bergoglio hypocritically postures himself as "Mr. Zero Tolerance"! What can one say but that the facts prove his eponym a lie. He is perpetrating yet another propaganda smokescreen to turn his own responsibility away from himself and his perverted Newchurch of the New Order.
Truth forces us to protest that Bergoglio's action on April 12, 2015, was evil, and seriously so. Does not Satan mix some good with his evil that even the elect may be deceived? Bergoglio has named an objective Schismatic, the "Unsaint" Gregory of Narek, as a Doctor of Newchurch. Does a Schismatic who belongs to an heretical body, the Eastern Orthodox sect, have anything to teach Catholics? Some good things can be said about Gregory of Narek (e.g. he apparently did not accept the Monophysite heresy of his own denomination), but that is beside the point.
Never in history had any Schismatic been named a "Saint," let alone now as a Doctor of Newchurch. This is a sly and slippery device to prepare Newchurchers for worse things to come -- for St. Martin "The Lutheran" and St. Martin Luther King, for St. Cauvin "The Calvinist," St. Ulrich Zwingli, St. Thomas Cranmer, St. John Knox, St. John Wesley, and every Heretic ever born. Let them all be "unsainted" for Francis-Bergoglio's unCatholic New Order sect! They are all Newchurch "Unsaints," along with such heretics as Teilhard de Chardin, de Lubac, Rahner, Ratzinger, Oscar Romero.
It does not matter if Gregory of Narek was perhaps not responsible for being born into an Schismatic sect. It is irrelevant whether he is in Heaven or not. The Church canonizes faithful as models for emulation, and those born outside her embrace are not that, no matter how "good" they might be. Certainly it is a perversion to think that a Schismatic "Doctor of Newchurch" teach Catholics!
This is a scandal and an error, and it again calls seriously into question Newchurch's legitimacy on any level.
Members of Francis-Bergoglio's own Newpapal Commission on Protection of Minors took their ire to the Commission President on April 13, 2015. Two of the dissenting members were victims of sex crimes by Newchurch clergy themselves. They, like half of the Chilean Parliament and most of the Newclergy of the Newdiocese of Osorno, Chile, strenuously condemned Francis-Bergoglio's appointment of Juan Barros, a notorious voyeur and paedophile collaborator
The members told Commission President and Boston, Massachusetts, Newcardinal Sean O'Malley, himself implicated in paedophile scandals, just what they though of Bergoglio's appointment of the paedophile. Even when challenged, Bergoglio adamantly refused to withdraw the appointment, or even to conduct a formal investigation. On March 21, 2015, a crowd of 4,000 Chileans attacked Barros at his "installation" in St. Matthew's Newcathedral. Barros had to be escorted out a side door by police, and the service was ended.
The members told O'Malley that protection of children should be Bergoglio's primary concern. They objected to the Newpope's appointment of Newbishops who have no commitment to or understanding of protecting children. Furthermore, they charged, Newbishops are failing to enact effective policies on sex crimes by Newclergy against children and to monitor carefully compliance. [Some information for this Commentary was contributed by the Associated Press.]
True Catholics, all this is part of Francis-Bergoglio's stage play that uses the lives of children as pawns in a Newchurch Paedophile Ring that is far larger than the Newchurch "Gay Lobby," on which Bergoglio himself previously commented. The motto of Francis "Mr. Zero Tolerance" Bergoglio's Newpapacy is "Verba, non Facta" ["All Talk and No Action"]. Newchurch's Great Sex and Embezzlement Holocaust continues unabated from the "Unsaint" JPII-Wojtyla (1978-2005) and Benedict "the Abdicate" Ratzinger (2005-2013).
Bernie Fellay and his Neo-SSPX are in the center of controversy again. Newcardinal Mauro Polli, of Buenos Aires, has not objected to Fellay's New Order-bent organization to be recognized by the Argentinean government as "an association of [New]diocesan right." However, the "recognition" was not given to Fellay's Neo-SSPX Corporation under its common title, but under a pseudonymous moniker, the "Fraternity of the Apostles of Jesus and Mary."
Remember when Fellay got close to a sellout to the New Order sect in 2012 that he was going to change the name of his Neo-SSPX to the "Apostolic Administration of St. Savior." What's in a name? Apparently, nothing, when it comes to Fellay and his Neo-SSPX -- a chameleon that changes its color depending on how close it wants sidle up to the New Order sect!
On April 13, 2015, the Secretary of the "Ecclesia Dei" Commission, Guido Pozzo, was quick to deny that Francis-Bergoglio approved of the deal. He denied that Fellay and his Neo-SSPX had any "juridical recognition as a clerical society." He denied that Fellay and his priest-presbyters are "legitimate." [Some information for this Commentary was contributed by La Stampa.]
True Catholics, here we go again. Bernie Fellay has not disavowed this association with the New Order sect, but seems desperate to accept any "recognition," just as he has with his pro-sellout policy these last decades. His Founder, Archbishop Lefebvre, to the contrary, rightly disavowed "recognition" by Newchurch as "unCatholic." It seems to be further evidence of Fellay's plans to sell out Archbishop Lefebvre's once traditional Catholic organization to the anti-Catholic Newchurch of the New Order, now led by Francis "Mr. Marxist" Bergoglio.
If anyone wonders whether Francis-Bergoglio's embracing of homosexuality is official, it is. His Newchurch fired a Newchurch-school teacher from her position after she published her opinion that homosexual activists "want to reengineer western civilization into a slow extinction. She added: “We need healthy families with a mother and a father for the sake of children and humanity." That is a perfectly Catholic position, supported by secular psychological studies.
Nevertheless, Patricia Jannuzzi was fired on March 16, 2015, from Immaculata School, a Newchurch institution in Somerville, New Jersey, by her Newchurch presbyter-pastor after a Hollywood "gay activist," who married another sodomite, whom he called his "husband," and "adopted" an innocent child, protested Jannuzzi's opinion. Brennan them rushed to the defense of the sodomite and claimed that Jannuzzi's opinions "do not in any way represent the philosophy, mission, or student experience of this high school." Newbishop Paul Bootkowski sided with the "gay activist" and supported his presbyter's firing of Jannuzzi.
But even if Newbishop Bootkowski isn't Catholic -- Newbishops of Francis-Bergoglio's New Order sect never are --, some of the school's parents, who had an iota of Catholicism left in them, protested. They stood up for Jannuzzi and condemned the presbyter-pastor for siding with a Hollywood "gay activist" against Catholic teaching. After all, Jannuzzi's opinions reflect bedrock Catholic teaching.
Francis-Bergoglio's Newbishops may not be Catholic, but they are certainly political creatures. Bootkoski was slammed on two radio ads broadcasted on a New York radio station and accused of trying to cover up Jannuzzi's firing. Jannuzzi, you see, had violated Bergoglio's anti-Catholic stance in favor of sodomy, even of children ("Who am I to judge?") because she didn't "communicate the faith [the Newchurch faith] in a way that is positive."
In Bergoglio's sham Newchurch, one must be positive about sodomy, one of the four biblical Sins that Cry out to Heaven for Retribution. When Catholic teaching had no effect upon Bergoglio's anti-Catholic Newbishop, the parents' outcry did. On April 10, 2015, less than one month after Jannuzzi's firing, Bootkoski reinstated Jannuzzi with full pay and benefits. [Some information for this Commentary was contributed by Catholic World News.]
True Catholics, these anti-Catholic Newbishops and Newpopes rely upon Newchurcher's mindless "respect," which they rely upon to prevent them from speaking out against their Newbishops and Newpopes. It is the same technique that Bernie Fellay of the Neo-SSPX relies upon from his Neo-SSPX sheeple. But when just a few do speak out, as occurred in this case, the Newbishops and Newpopes fall. One Newpope was even forced to abdicate because of increasing public outcry against his immorality. The moral of the story is that the Newchurch of the New Order is a bully, and like all bullies, if you courageously stand up to them, they run away with their tail between their legs!
A campaign has been started to initiate a cause for Fr. Thomas Byles, the Titanic priest, should be canonized. However, that canonization will have to wait until the Newchurch of the New Order is routed out of the "Establishment Church," and the Catholic Church is fully restored in its place. Before that happens, Newchurch canonizations are merely con-anizations, fraudulent cons. For further information, click on FAQ10: How Do You Explain These Traditional Catholic Beliefs? in the section "Canonizations - New Order."
When the Titanic was sinking on April 15, 1912, after hitting an iceberg, Fr. Byles twice refused to join a lifeboat and instead remained with passengers to offer the Sacraments. He had celebrated Mass -- the valid Traditional Latin Mass, of course -- for second- and third-class passengers on board the ship, most notably on the morning of the tragedy. His sermon on that occasion called prayers and Sacraments "spiritual lifeboats." [Some information for this Commentary was contributed by the BBC.]
True Catholics, Fr. Byles's actions before perishing with 1,500 others aboard the Titanic were personally praised by Pope St. Pius X. Fr. Byles is an outstanding example of a real priest before the Newchurch of the New Order replaced the established Catholic Church and substituted phony unordained presbyters to "preside over the assembly of the people" in an invalid Protestantized service, which affords no grace whatsoever to Newchurchers.
Newchurchers in the Holy Land will celebrate Easter not on April 5, but on April 12, 2015. This new agreement by the Francis-Bergoglio regime moves the date of Easter from that in the calendar of Pope Gregory XIII to the date used by the Eastern Orthodox schismatics in the calendar of Julius Caesar. This new agreement seems to bring down upon Francis-Bergoglio and Newchurch the excommunication imposed as early as the second century. The Protestants are adhering to the original Catholic date for Easter since the second century.
During the second century a heated dispute arose over the date of Easter. Pope Victor I (r. 189-199) terminated the controversy by threatening with excommunication all those who failed to comply with the Roman custom. That day was regarded as the exact date on which Christ arose from the dead, according to the authority of Sts. Peter and Paul.
Bergoglio's agreement to celebrate Easter according to the Eastern Orthodox schismatic calendar applies to all New Order churches of the Holy Land, encompassing Newdioceses and eparchies in Jordan, Israel, and the Palestinian territories. However, the agreement does not apply in Jerusalem and Bethlehem, where Bergoglio couldn't change the date of Easter because of the "Status Quo" concordat, which provides that traditional practices cannot be changed in the Holy Land. [Some information for this Commentary was contributed by Vatican Information Services.]
True Catholics, changing the date of Easter away from the Catholic standard since the second century was a little-known radical provision of the Modernist Vatican II Council. The plan was concealed as an Appendix to the infamous Constitution Sancrosanctum concilium, which ended up in the Protestantization and invalidation of the Catholic Mass. This is just further evidence that now, fifty years later, the dirty-work of that anti-Catholic Council is still corrupting Catholic faith and practice.
Sodomites, murders, and paedophiles of the world rejoice! Francis "The Fraud" Bergoglio going to proclaim on April 11, 2015, an "Extraordinary Jubilee of Mercy" from December 8, 2015, through November 20, 2016, the new date to which the Newchurch of the New Order moved the Feast of Christ the King, deliberately set by Pope Pius XI on the last Sunday of October to butt heads with Protestant Reformation Day. Bergoglio's proclamation smacks of yet another anti-Christian fraud. Sacred Scripture makes two things very clear: (1) mercy must be balanced with justice; (2) repentance must come before mercy, as clearly evidenced by St. John the Baptist and the Parable of the Prodigal Son, inter alia. In two years, Bergoglio has dished out as much unChristian "mercy" as can be stomached. What about a Year of Justice for a change? [Some information for this Commentary was contributed by Vatican Information Services.]
April 11 is the eve of the fabricated New Order "Feast of Divine Mercy." The notion to exalt a false "mercy" above justice in order to downplay sin was a stratagem of the condemned philosophy of Modernism and its progeny, the Modernist Vatican II Council (1962-1965). At the center of the New Order sect's rejection of Catholic moral doctrine is the institution of a false "Divine Mercy" cult, initiated around a caricature of a Polish nun, one Sister Faustina, whose diary was placed on the Index Librorum Prohibitorum [Index of Forbidden Books] in 1936. This decision was upheld by Pope John XXIII before Vatican II, on November 28, 1958.
After Pope John XXIII's suppression of the cult, deliberate mistranslations began to be circulated that "oecumenized" Faustina's original diary. For example, her confirmation of the Catholic doctrine that Jews need to convert to Christianity was eliminated. Prophecies warning of a New Order were expunged. Faustina's quotation of Our Lord's words condemning "pagans, heretics, and schismatics" was omitted from the "sanitized" Modernist-fabricated cult.
True Catholics, this heretically-tainted cult of "Divine Mercy," condemned by Popes Pius XI and John XXIII, was scandalously entered on the Novus Ordo liturgical calendar by the "Unsaint" Polish Newpope to replace the high feast day of the Octave of Easter. The "Feast of Divine Mercy" is strictly Novus Ordo and has no basis in the bimillennial Catholic liturgy. For further information, click on FAQ11: How Do You Explain These Traditional Catholic Practices? in the section "Divine Mercy."
We all learned in arithmetic that zero multiplied by anything equals zero. So let us apply this lesson to vaunted "increase" recently announced by the U.S. Conference of Catholic [Sic] Bishops in the number of presbyters to be "installed" in the U.S. Newchurch in 2015, which is said to be a 25 per cent increase. Well, maybe the number of presbyter "installations" is not zero, but it is pretty close to zero. Keep in mind:
True Catholics, it is clear that half a presbyter "increase" in Newchurch "installations" in 2015 just doesn't cut it, with upwards of 430 presbyters dying off each year. It is clear, furthermore, that the Modernist Vatican II Council (1962-1965) was a damnable lie. It brought not sunshine, but the darkness of Satan. And that fact was publicly proclaimed just seven years later by none other than Paul VI-Monitini, the first Newpope, who himself signed every one of the documents of the Modernist Vatican II Council (Pope John XXIII did not sign a single one of them):
We have the impression that through some cracks in the wall THE SMOKE OF SATAN HAS ENTERED THE TEMPLE OF GOD: it is doubt, uncertainty, questioning, dissatisfaction, confrontation.... We thought that after the Council a day of sunshine would have dawned for the history of the Church. What dawned, instead, was a day of clouds and storms, of darkness, of searching and uncertainties.
Color photography was attempted beginning in the 1840s, but it wasn't until the 1850s that a practical process was developed by the Scottish physicist James Maxwell. Shortly after that time the noted American photographer Mathew Brady began capturing historic scenes of the American War Between the States, most in black and white, but a few, as this one, in color.
One of Brady's early photographs, rarely seen, is of a Traditional Latin Mass, the same Catholic and Apostolic Mass at which Catholics of two millennia have worshipped and at which traditional Catholics worship today, continuing the true Mass into the third millennium. This photograph shows Fr. Thomas Mooney celebrating the Traditional Latin Mass in the camp of the 69th New York Regiment on June 1, 1861, at the outbreak of the war.
True Catholics, the Traditional Latin Mass is sacred and reverent wherever it is celebrated, even in the middle of a war. We TRADITIO Fathers have seen such photographs also from World War II, one of a Mass being celebrated in a barn with the soldiers devoutly kneeling in the mud with an angelic look as if they had already been transported to Heaven. Only God knows how many souls of those who died later that day in battle were saved through the morning's Traditional Latin Mass, full of grace. One can only lament how many contemporary soldiers are lost because of the profane and irreverent, not to say invalid, New Order Protestant-Masonic Pagan Mess of 1969+, empty of grace.
Dear TRADITIO Fathers:
Independent traditional Catholic bishops Richard Williamson and Jean-Michel Faure have said publicly that they are going to consecrate more traditional Catholic bishops for the worldwide traditional Catholic movement. But where are they going to find candidates? After all, the number of traditional Catholic priests is not very great, is it?
The TRADITIO Fathers Reply.
Actually, the number of traditional Catholic priests is quite substantial. Most people are aware of Bernie Fellay's Neo-SSPX, but there seems to be a conspiracy among the press and Newchurch to cover up the fact, so embarrassing to Fellay and Newchurch, that the Neo-SSPX is only a fraction of the total number of traditional Catholic priests (if one can any longer consider the Neo-SSPX clergy to be fully traditional Catholic priests). There are thousands of traditional Catholic priests around the world not associated with the Neo-SSPX. Many of these independent traditional Catholic priests have been fighting against the anti-Catholic New Order sect since the Modernist Vatican II Council (1962-1965). They are not the johnny-come-latelys of fraudulent "Motu" or "Extraordinary" Messes that have become the now-fading hula-hoop fad of Newchurch, but sound, experienced fighters for the traditional Catholic Faith for many decades.
Moreover, these priests are not half traditional, as are the Neo-SSPX ones, but fully traditional. Although some of these traditional Catholic priests are members of organizations such as the Congregation of Mary Immaculate Queen (CMRI), the Society of St. Pius V (SSPV), and others, most of these traditional Catholic priests are independent of organizational entanglements. For further information and a listing of such priests for North America alone, click on the TRADITIO Network's Official Traditional Catholic Directory department, provided to the TRADITIO Network by the National Registry of Traditional Latin Masses.
With the former Neo-SSPX priests now gone independent in the group loosely known as The Resistance, it is the independent traditional Catholic priests who now constitute the fastest-growing group. Bernie Fellay's Neo-SSPX is losing clergy far faster than it is gaining any, fully one-sixth of the entire number of Neo-SSPX priests having defected from Fellay in the last few years because of Fellay's policy to sell out to the New Order sect.
It is from this large group of independent traditional Catholic priests that bishops Williamson and Faure will be able select candidates. You can take great hope in the fact that there is no dearth of highly-qualified, dedicated candidates to be consecrated as independent traditional Catholic bishops to fight the anti-Catholic Newchurch of the New Order.
It appears that Francis-Bergoglio was not paying attention to the Passions read during Holy Week. If he had, he would have noticed the words of St. Dismas, the Good Thief on the cross beside Christ. He says to his fellow criminal, Getas, on the other side of Christ:
Dost not even thou fear God, seeing that thou art under the same sentence? and we indeed justly, for we are receiving what our deeds deserved, but this man [Christ] has done nothing wrong" (Luke 23:40-41).
Bible trumps Newpope. The teaching here being relayed by the Evangelist Luke in the Bible is that capital punishment is a just punishment for high crimes. And the Roman crucifixion was a far more severe means of capital punishment than the firing squad, the electric chair, the gas chamber, or the lethal injection of modern times. Remember too the capital punishment that Judas to himself for his betrayal of his Lord Jesus Christ: the noose.
On March 20, 2015, Francis-Bergoglio made an erroneous statement to the International Commission against the Death Penalty, a statement certainly not representative of Catholic theology (but, then, Bergoglio is an aficionado of Marxism, not Catholicism), that capital punishment is always "inadmissable." That statement directly contradicts the Magisterium of the Church and the authoritative Doctor of Grace, St. Augustine; the Universal Doctor, St. Thomas Aquinas; and the great moral theologian, St. Alphonsus Liguori, and every other Church authority. It even contradicts the New Order sect's own 1997 Catechismus Catholicae Ecclesiae!
Now Bergoglio's error has seeped into his four Newbishop henchmen in Massachusetts, who have issued a statement voicing their opposition to the use of the death penalty in the case of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, the Marathon Bomber. Tsarnaev is on trial for his life for the April 2013 bombing that killed three people and injured more than 200 who were standing near the finish line of the Boston Marathon. So jumpy were Bergoglio's four Newbishop's that they didn't even wait for the jury's verdict, but attempted to tamper with the jury's ultimate verdict. [Some information for this Commentary were contributed by Catholic World News.]
For further information, click on FAQ10: How Do You Explain These Traditional Catholic Beliefs? in the section "Capital Punishment/Death Penalty."
Now Newchurch "nuns" are getting into the child-abuse business, which still roils unabated in Francis-Bergoglio's New Order sect. Sister Ludovita, a "religious education" teacher in Slovakia, on Easter Sunday, April 5, 2015, stabbed a schoolboy in the hand to "teach" him about the suffering of Christ. Apparently, she was trying to replicate the pain of driving a nail into the palm. So far has Francis-Bergoglio's sect fallen into sadistic abuse and torture of children.
Apparently, Ludovita selected the boy at random, ordered that he come up to the front of the class, and then rammed a needle into the boy's hand in front of the horrified class. She told the class that similar punishment would likewise be visited upon them if they behaved badly. Parents openly expressed concern that the sadist "nun" was so out of control that she might try other "crucifixion" punishments as "instructional devices."
Although the sadist Newchurch "nun" denied perpetrating the torture, the local presbyter believed the evidence, the boy, and his parents, and dismissed Ludovita from the school. [Some information for this Commentary was contributed by the London Daily Mirror.]
True Catholics, you have to wonder how evil a New Order sect Francis-Bergoglio is running that creates an atmosphere in which one of his sect's nun's would torture a child. How many more of Francis-Bergoglio's "nuns," presbyters, and Newbishops are doing the same -- and even worse? Yet there is no surprise here. Newchurch has had a series of three "Paedophile" Newpopes now: the "Unsaint" JPII-Wojtyla, Benedict-Ratzinger, and Francis-Bergoglio. It is clear that Francis "Mr. Zero Tolerance" Bergoglio has not lifted one effective finger against child abuse and torture. In fact, he himself in March 2015 appointed a known fellow paedophiliac to head a Newdiocese in Chile.
A Neocon Newchurch "blog," often quoted by ignorant news media, has shot itself in the foot by publishing an analysis of the Freemason presbyter Hannibal Bugnini's "modernizations" of the Traditional Latin Mass, which were in adopted in 1956 and 1962.
The analysis proves that destructive changes were done hastily and without due consideration for their effect. Far more importantly, they were politically- and ideologically-motivated attacks on the Catholic Faith. The analysis makes it clear that the agents of Novus Ordoization simply foisted off their own fancies and notions, having no historical or liturgical justification whatsoever, not even a pretended one. That is why Bugnini & Co. worked in so much secrecy that not even the highly-conservative Congregation of Rites knew about their deceit until it was too late.
The agents of Novus Ordo-ization had special access to Pius XII at at time when he was perhaps non compos mentis. In late 1954 the pope contracted a long illness so severe that he considered abdication. Even when he partially recovered, he was never the same. His work habits, also so meticulous before, noticeably slipped. The filling of vacancies lagged severely. He avoided long ceremonies, canonizations, and consistories. His partial recovery again slipped right at the time that Bugnini & Co. did their best to destroy traditional Catholic Mass, Divine Office, and Sacraments. From 1956 to 1958, the pope was a basket-case. Because of the medical treatment that he was receiving, he suffered horrible nightmares, accompanied by blood-curdling screams heard through the Apostolic apartments.
Given this admission by the Neocon "blog," one wonders how it can remain slave to the Half New Order Vatican II Mess of 1962 rather than the Traditional Latin Mass of 1950 and before. It is now clear beyond the shadow of a doubt (as it was before for fully-traditional Catholics) that anything touched by Bugnini's vile hand must be rejected and expelled. That man should be disinterred and his body hurled into the Tiber. The doctor does not remove just enough of the poison from the patient's blood to assure his survival on life-support: he removes all the poison to restore the patient to good health. The poisoned Mess of 1962, aka erroneously since 2007 as "Extraordinary" is sick to death. Once cannot embrace its sickness, only purge it and hold to the Traditional Latin Mass of 1950 and before.
Protestant leaders are organizing to protest "gay marriage" in the United States and to enact protections for Christians, whose charities, hospitals, and schools, are trying to maintain some semblance of Christian practice. Christian businesses across the U.S. are being targeted as "discriminatory," even though no actual cases of "discrimination" have been revealed. It's another Modernist-Liberalist scam perpetrated with the connivance of the Leftist media in the U.S.
Even the secular world's Great God of Racism, Mr. Martin Luther King, called upon Christians to civil disobedience against government laws they said would compel them to violate their views. Apparently, civil disobedience has been canonized -- if it is a matter of discrimination against Negros, but Christians discriminated against are not supported by these Liberalists, but vilified.
Although many Protestant ministers and congregations are fighting anti-Christian laws in the United States, Francis-Bergoglio's Newchurch of the New Order has wimped out. With Bergoglio preaching immoral and anti-Catholic nonsense about "welcoming" sodomites, who practice one of the Biblical Four Sins that Cry out to Heaven for Retribution, it is no surprise that even Neo-con Newchurchers have backed off from fighting this gross immorality.
In 2011, the Catholic [Sic] Bishops' Conference was involving itself in the issue. That involvement has certainly faded since 2013, when Francis "Mr. Gay Man of the Year" Bergoglio was elected by the New Order sect to be its Newpope. [Some information for this Commentary was contributed by the Associated Press.]
True Catholics, the Third Paedophile Newpope, Francis-Bergoglio, has added homophilia to his paedophilia. It's all part of Bergoglio's plan to turn Newchurch into an arm of the Modernist/Liberalist Marxist revolution, with which he was associated in South America. The latest news indicates that he plans to Novus Ordo con-anize the Marxist Newbishop Oscar Romero. Meanwhile, the Newchurch pseudo-traditionalists who fell for Benedict-Ratzinger's Great "Extraordinary" Mess Hoax of 2007 are now condemned by Bergoglio as "Pelagian and Donatist" heretics. The volte-face could not have happened to a more deserving bunch of perfidious traitors to the Catholic Faith!
Dear TRADITIO Fathers
As a New Order presbyter, I have come to the point of asking, Is Francis-Bergoglio's Newchurch in schism from the Catholic Faith? I am wondering whether the prophesy has come to pass: "There will be cardinals against cardinals; bishops against bishops?" I receive inquiries from my Newchurch congregation, who see Francis-Bergoglio deviating from teaching the Catholic Faith and aligning himself with homosexuals, Marxists, and atheists. Consequently, they wonder whether the Newchurch and the Newpope are still Catholic.
I have to admit that I wonder the same thing myself and have being thinking of leaving the Newchurch and applying to a traditional Catholic bishop to redo my seminary studies and see whether I have a vocation to be a true priest rather than a New Order presbyter.
The TRADITIO Fathers Reply.
True Catholics do not have to rely on alleged "prophesies," just clear-headed Roman thinking an awareness of Church history. Since the accession of the Newchurch of the New Order in the 1960s, which took over the institutional Church and ejected the true Catholic Faith, true Catholic priests, and true Catholic laypeople, there have been schism and even teaching that bears the odor of heresy from the New Order sect, now headed by Francis-Bergoglio.
Many Catholics seem surprised to learn that popes have been schismatic, and even heretical before. That is a fact in the history of the Church that cannot be denied. For that, we have the authority of the dogmatic Council Vatican I and the Fathers and Doctors of the Church, who note that about 40 out of some 260 popes have been schismatic or heretical.
For further information, click on POPELIM: Limitations of Papal Authority to Change Sacred Tradition, From the Writings of Roman Catholic Popes, Councils, Saints, and Theologians.
When their Newchurch leaders did nothing to stop two notorious paedophile presbyters, what police presume to be a group of outraged Melbourne, Australia, Newchurchers took matters into their own hands. They burned down three of Francis-Bergoglio's New Order churches. Two New Order St. Mary churches and one St. James church in the Newarchdiocese of Melbourne were torched, the last on March 30, 2015. The incidents were reminiscent of actions that Chilean Newchurchers took on March 21, 2015, to prevent Bergoglio's appointee, a known voyeur and paedophile collaborator, from being installed as a Newbishop. Newchurch "authorities" have tried to deny the police reports because they are too embarrassed to have to admit that their own Newchurchers may now be turning against Francis-Bergoglio's paedophile-friendly Newchurch organization.
The notorious paedophile presbyters were Dennis Pickering and Kevin O'Donnell, and the three churches torched were all ones that they had led. Pickering sodomized boys for decades, then escaped to Britain, having never been prosecuted by Newchurch authorities. O'Donnell, who sodomized boys and raped girls, was never prosecuted by the "Unsaint" JPII-Wojtyla, but was convicted in 1992 in an Australian civil court. Between them, the two presbyters sodomized and raped dozens of boys and girls as young as eight years of age.
One child victim summed up the situation this way: "Pickering escaped; the [New]church didn't assist in bringing him to justice. When victims turned to the [New]church, they offered them no support." The child victims have given up on Francis-Bergoglio and his Newchurch and are now seeking redress from Royal Commission into Institutional Child Sexual Abuse, which Australia recently set up to deal with a Newchurch clergy gone wild. [Some information for this Commentary was contributed by the Sydney Morning Herald.]
True Catholics, one can, of course, lament the burning of churches, but the moral of the story is that corrupt Newchurch leaders, like Francis-Bergoglio, are at long last beginning to pay a high price for their institutional predations against children and the true Catholic Faith.
Two independent traditional Catholic bishops have stunned Francis-Bergoglio's Newchurch by announcing that they plan within one or two years to consecrate a new generation of traditional Catholic bishops to serve traditional Catholicism for the next generation. Bishops Richard Williamson and Jean-Michel Faure, who are associated with a traditional Catholic movement called "The Resistance," made the announcement on March 28, 2015, at the traditional Santa Cruz Monastery in Novo Frigurgo, Brazil, outside of Rio de Janeiro.
The traditional Catholic bishops whom Williamson and Faure consecrate in the traditional Sacrament of Holy Orders will be undeniably valid, unlike the Newbishops of the New Order, who since the New Ordinal of 1968 have not been consecrated, but merely "installed" as overseers. The bishops said that they already have two candidates for consecration. Bishops Williamson and Faure further stated that they reject Francis-Bergoglio and what they called his "New Religion" and that they would not engage in any dialogue with Newrome until Newrome converts from the "New Religion" to the traditional Catholic Faith. They stated in no uncertain terms: Francis-Bergoglio "does not follow the doctrine of the faith that are the words of Jesus Christ."
As to Bernie Fellay's Neo-SSPX, which broke with its founder, the revered Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, to engage in negotiations to sell out to the Newrome that the Archbishop called "not Catholic," Bishop Faure commented: "We resist capitulation, we resist conciliation of St. Pius X [Society] with Rome." He indicated that traditional Catholics believe whatsoever it took for Newrome to return to Catholicism, "conflict could be a catalyst." [Some information for this Commentary was contributed by Reuters.]
True Catholics, it may be that finally people like Williamson and Faure are coming over to the side of us TRADITIO Fathers, who have been arguing for over twenty years that one cannot "negotiate" with the New Order sect, play up to its paedophile Newpopes, much less sell out to them. Instead, one must, like the Apostolic Fathers and Doctors of the Church, confront error, heresy, and schism within the "institutional" Church, just as St. Paul confronted the error of St. Peter in no uncertain terms, as related in Sacred Scripture (Galatians 2:11). Fellay is apparently too demented to realize that twenty years of his sellout policy has accomplished nothing. It is only by confronting the enemy that such error can be correct. So declared the Church's principal theologian, St. Thomas Aquinas.
You've all heard the propaganda. Everyone loves Francis-Bergoglio. They don't see him as the hypocritical Third Paedophile Newpope that he is, but as one who "welcomes" sodomites and, like the Chinese Communists, condemns parents who have more than one child as "breeding like rabbits." The late Eugenicist Margaret Sanger has finally found a Newpope to forward her teachings on birth control, sterilization, and non-productive "gay" marriages. The problem is that the sodomites, birth-controllers, and sterilizers still won't darken the doors of Newchurch parishes. Thus, Newchurch is shutting down. Of course, Bergoglio will never admit that fact obvious to anyone with eyes. Instead, he gives all kinds of excuses why having one-third the number of Newparishes is actually better! But everyone knows that it isn't.
Take, for example, the fact that on March 30, 2015, the Newchurch Primate of Scotland, Newarchbishop Leo Cushley, told his Newchurchers not to "submit to pessimism" because he is closing 70 of his 100 Newparishes. Trying to lie to his clueless Newchurchers that black is white, Cushley claims that the pitiful remnant of New Order churches in Scotland will be "powerhouses of devotion." Yeah, sure. And 100 minus 70 equals 3,000. Or so the "new math" of Bergoglio's New Order sect teaches. Cushley gave the equally gloomy news for Newchurch that within five years the number of (invalid) New Order presbyters in Scotland would sink to a paltry 33.
Add to this the fact that Scotland's previous Newchurch Primate, like others around Francis-Bergoglio's world, was implicated in paedophilia. But Bergoglio wouldn't fire Newcardinal Keith O'Brien outright. He gave O'Brien a long reprieve, then allowed him to ride off into the sunset with his sumptuous Newcardinatial retirement plan in full force. [Some information for this Commentary was contributed by the Catholic Herald.]
True Catholics, Francis-Bergoglio's New Order sect is going to Hell in handbasket, and everybody knows it. Bergoglio, like the Protestants, is good now only as a propaganda vehicle for offering to admit unrepentant sodomists, paedophiles, fornicators into his Protestantized Newchurch, after which he and his corrupt Newchurch will all be flushed down the privy -- just as they deserve.
An undercover investigative reporter for the U.K. Daily Mail caught Newchurch officials at the Barry Catholic [Sic] University outside Miami, Florida, on hidden-camera video approving a Newchurch student club devoted to raising money for the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) saying: "We're here to get that done." The club proposed by the undercover reporter would be named "Sympathectic Students in Support of the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria" and would send money and supplies to the ISIL terrorist army.
The undercover reporter clearly explained her purpose: "I want to start fundraising efforts on campus, and what I want to do is raise funds to send overseas. [ISIL] are terrorists, but we're trying to help them." The "Catholic" school's Coordinator for Leadership personally offered to help her create the organization and agreed with her request to "pass out Islamic State flags and educate people" at an annual student Festival of Nations fair. The school's Coordinator was backed by the Associate Director of Multicultural Programs and the Professor of the Honors Program, who said that she was "glad to sign on" as the group's faculty advisor.
Barry University is a private, "Catholic" university situated in a suburb of Miami, Florida. It is now one of the largest Newchurch universities in the southeastern United States. The "Catholic" University has received 221,000,000 dollars of U.S. taxpayer funds, some of which obviously are being used to support infidel Islam. The "Catholic" University would not speak to the press about its funding of anti-Catholic Islamic terrorist groups. Francis-Bergoglio and his usually-prolix spokesman, Federico Lombardi, reacted with silence when grilled by the international press on March 30, 2015.
True Catholics, the darkness that is the Newchurch of the New Order is masterfully covered up by Francis-Bergoglio, the same Francis-Bergoglio who recently appointed a known paedophile to be his Newbishop in Chile. Yet Newchurchers continue to bury their heads in the sand like dumb ostriches because they cannot admit to themselves that their leader is the most corrupt leader since the "Bad" Pope Alexander VI-Borgia. Anyone who still thinks that Bergoglio's Newchurch organization is "Catholic" must be deaf, dumb, and blind!
Return to Daily Commentaries from the TRADITIO Fathers.