|
For answers to many questions, consult the over 225 pages of the CURRENT MONTHLY REVISED EDITION of the Official Traditional Catholic Directory, Listing All Traditional Latin Masses and Traditional Resources for North America. SITE REPRESENTATIVES, BE SURE TO CHECK YOUR TRADITIONAL SITE'S LISTING MONTHLY FOR CORRECTNESS. |
For information about the
protocols for sending questions to the TRADITIO Fathers, click on Ask the Fathers.
If you wish to support the TRADITIO Network's Apostolate, click on the TRADITIO Network's home page and see the
options provided in the "Make a Donation to the TRADITIO Network's
Apostolate" section toward the bottom of the home page.
For Gregorian chant recordings of the fully-traditional
Traditional Latin Roman rites corresponding
to the season, click on Gregorian
Chant.
For a free subscription to TRADITIO's RSS News Feed listing the
most current Daily Commentaries, enter
"https://www.traditio.com/rssfeed.xml"
into your Yahoo, Google, Microsoft, or other news aggregator.
Dear TRADITIO Fathers:
Newchurchers have become more and more upset by the constant changes that the Synodal Newchurch of the New Order is making, most of which dispose of traditional rites (if there are any left) and weaken the Catholic principles that we were taught to live. Is Newchurch likely to become like the Eastern Church, divided between two brands of apostasy, "High" (New Latin Mess) and "Low" (New Order Mess) Church, like the Anglican/Episcopalians or the Lutherans?
THE TRADITIO FATHERS REPLY.
THE REAL PROBLEM IS THAT THE NEW LATIN MESS OF 1962 IS NOT THE TRADITIONAL LATIN MASS. It is a fake, concocted by the proto-Newchurch's liturgical head, the Freemason presbyter Hannibal Bugnini, as he himself admits in his thousand-page book, to snooker Neocon Newchurchers into thinking that they were getting the real Traditional Latin Mass. They weren't. The 1962 Mess was an experimental, transitional Mess that was gone even before the "New Mess" of 1969 took over. To this day Newchurch rejects the real Traditional Latin Mass before the corruptions of the 1950s and 1960s deliberately leading to the New Order Mess of 1969. It is already shutting down even most of the fake New Latin Messes of 1962 in accordance with the 2021 decree "Traditionis custodes."
Even aside from the serious corruptions contained in the New Latin Mess, that Mess is being simulated within the context of the apostate Synodal Newchurch. The sermons, or as Newchurch now calls them, "homilies," are controlled by the Marxist/Modernist Newbishops, the liturgical calendar is Protestantized-Novus Ordoized to one degree or another, the Messes are often conducted in Modernist Newchurch buildings, etc. And, what is worse, Newchurch has no valid "eucharist," because the persons simulating the New Latin Mess have merely been "installed" as presbyter-ministers by those very Newbishops, who themselves have never been consecrated in the Catholic Sacrament of Holy Orders, but merely "installed" like Protestant bishops.
All of Newchurch, whether in Latin, English, Swahili, or any other language, is no different from the heretic Protestant church down the street. Ironically, some of the more traditional Protestant churches, though still heretical, are closer to true Catholicism than the Newchurches that falsely continue to call themselves "Catholic" to maintain their ever-diminishing power and money. The statistics show that Newchurch is sinking fast: Mess attendance down to single digits, thousands of once-Catholic church buildings closing permanently, no young men to speak of entering the paedophiliac Newseminaries, religious orders collapsing or already defunct.
The New Latin Mess under the control of the Synodal Newchurch of the New Age is not the solution. It is a problem, an apostate wolf in sheep's clothing. That is why true Catholics have gotten as far away from Newchurch as they can, seeking one of the many Traditional Catholic churches, chapels, or oratories that have remained entirely independent of the fake Newchurch and that maintain valid Catholic Masses and Sacraments.
Although there is no record of Pseudo-Newpope Prevost-Leo meeting with a Traditional Catholic, he prominently and publicly meets with schismatics, heretics, pagans, Newchurchers, atheists, paedophiliacs, and pro-abotionists. On November 25, 2025, he posed for public pictures in the Newapostolic palace with rabid pro-abortionist, pro-LGBTQXXX U.S. Senator Amy Klobuchar. Klobuchar is a Congregationalist heretic. Congregationalism, which includes Klobuchar's so-called United Church of Christ, also emphasizes Leftism, "social justice" (a concocted construct of the Left), the "ordination" of ministresses, and immoral Wokeism. [Some information for this Commentary was contributed by the National Catholic Register.]
Amy Klobuchar has one of the most immoral voting records in the United States Senate. Yet Prevost was quick to give her an audience of thirty minutes, which he entirely denies to Traditional Catholics. Naturally, Klobuchar, whose Congregationalism traditionally regards Prevost as the "whore of Babylon," issued empty words about Prevost being a "true moral force."
Traditional Catholics, the apostate Pseudo-Newpope Prevost's predecessor, Bergoglio-Francis, publicly praised and prominently met with Ex-U.S. President J.R. Biden and Ex-U.S. Speaker of the House of Representatives Nancy Pelosi, both pro-abortion, pro-gay self-proclaimed "devout Catholics," so devout, in fact, that many Newdioceses denied them the Novus Ordo cookie and Kool-Aid. These Pseudo-Newpopes are indeed no moreally better than the crooked politicians whom they fawn over. The notion that they could be true Roman Catholic popes is mortally offensive to the true Catholic Faith.
What if you held a "unity conference," and only a few united to show up? That is essentially what happened to Pseudo-Newpope Prevost-Leo, who summoned the Eastern Orthodox to unite with him in Nicaea (modern Iznik, Turkey), to mark the 1700th anniversary of the First Oecumenical Council of Nicaea in A.D. 325. Most Orthodox rejected the apostate Newpope's summons and boycotted the event, which was devised to receive the Orthodox into "full communion" with the apostate Synodal Newchurch of the New Age.
The Eastern Orthodox were too smart to fall for this ploy. Their sect rejects Traditional Catholicism, as does the Synodal Newchurch of the New Order and its Pseudo-Newpopes. They reject the Filioque in the Creed. They reject the traditional date of Easter. The last time the Orthodox tried to unify with Rome, and the bull "Laetentur Caeli" was read out in the massive cathedral of Hagia Sophia in Constantinople, the people reacted with fury against the Orthodox bishops who had signed the union, which was thereby vitiated. [Some information for this Commentary was contributed by Hellinscope.]
Traditional Catholics, while Pseudo-Newpope Prevost-Leo and the so-called "Oecumenical" Patriarch, Bartholomew I, schemed toward a false union, the overwhelming majority of the Orthodox world, including Russia, Serbia, Jerusalem, Antioch, Romania, Bulgaria, and Georgia, condemned and boycotted the event entirely. Yet the mostly anti-Christian press of the Western world has barely covered the fact that most Orthodox have rejected Modernist/Marxist Prevost's "unity conference." In fact, most Eastern Orthodox do not recognize the so-called "Oecumenical" Patriarch, with whom Prevost is primarily dealing. So the Eastern Orthodox have literally spit on him, as they did on Pseudo-Newpope Bergoglio-Francis on his visit to the Middle East in 2014.
Dear TRADITIO Fathers:
A friend said that a crucifix, small or big, must have the inscription INRI upon it; otherwise, it should not be used. Is that correct?
THE TRADITIO FATHERS REPLY.
You are right to be skeptical of "friends" who purport to be knowledgeable about things beyond their ken. In fact, the official definition of a crucifix is "crux quae imaginem Crucifixi habet," a cross that bears the image of the Crucified. The addition of Pilate's titulus, or inscription, INRI, standing for "Iesus Nazarenus Rex Iudaeorum, Jesus of Nazareth King of the Jews, is commendable, but not required. As you have indicated, the small size of a given crucifix, such as that on a Rosary, may prevent the addition of the inscription.
On November 24, 2025, Chinese Newcardinal Joseph Zen, aged 93, who has stood up courageously against persecution by the Newpopes and the Synodal Newchurch of the New Order, has charged that Pseudo-Newpopes Bergoglio-Francis and his disciple Prevost-Leo have Zen charged that Newchurch has become like the Anglican/Episcopalian Church, "committing suicide with the world" and "producing "chaos and division." Zen went on to reject the Synodal Newchurch's final document, terming it "ambiguous and experimental."
Ironically, on October 16, 2025, after King Charles III appointed Sarah Mullally as the first Archbishopess of that Church in contravention of Scripture, an international traditionalist group called the Global Anglican Communion, comprising some 80 per cent of Anglicans worldwide, formally rejected Mullally and the Church of England and declared that it is henceforth the authentic Anglican Communion. [Some information for this Commentary was contributed by LS News.]
Traditional Catholics, Newcardinal Zen is known for his rock-solid anti-Communism. He deplored the Communist Chinese takeover of Hong Kong from the British and chastised Bergoglio for selling out to the Communist Chinese Dictator Xi Jinping. Zen also condemned Prevost for permitting an LGBTXXX "pilgrimage" inside St. Peter?s Basilica. Prevost knew of this event beforehand, yet issued no condemnation afterward. Zen called for public reparations of prayer and fasting to be made for Prevost's sinful action.
On November 25, 2025, Ana Diaz publicly charged Pseudo-Newpope Prevost-Leo in a Newvatican court with suborning paedophile sex crimes against her and her sisters by an intimate of Prevost. The presbyter in question had been quietly "dispensed" from the presbyterate, in a pattern that is quite common with the Newpopes, who never admit the crimes or publicly denounce them. When the victim found out about Prevost's "dispensation," she became outraged and went public.
Diaz has taken her case to a Newvatican court (which Prevost controls absolutely) to get justice for herself and her sisters against "all ecclesiastical officials who participated in or were responsible for these acts of negligence," which were never even minimally instigated by Newchurch. She has also demanded a "personal audience" with Prevost. D?az further exclaimed that "it is incomprehensible that instead of seeking the truth and repairing the victims, the decision was made to close the case through a papal grace that frees the abuser from facing the responsibility that corresponds to him, leaving us in a vulnerable situation with no reparation, where the only thing offered to us is payment for therapy." [Some information for this Commentary was contributed by LS News.]
Traditional Catholics, Pseudo-Newpope Prevost-Leo hasn't been in office even six months, and already rumblings of his involvement in paedophile sex-crime cover-ups of his intimates in Peru have started to surface. Ana Diaz and her sisters are only the latest victims. Prevost has plenty of time to meet with Hollywood celebrities, vulgar rock musicians, and pro-abortion politicians, but we bet he won't find time to meet with the child victim, Ana Diaz.
Already Pseudo-Newpope Prevost-Leo has drawn international condemnation for laying a wreath on the tomb of Mustafa Kemal Ataturk on November 27, 2025. Prevost ignored all the history of Ataturk's atrocities and venerated the dictator at the start of his first Newpapal junket, to Turkey. Ataturk established in 1923 a "New Turkey," devoid of the historic Christian communities there, whom he expelled, slaughtered, and exterminated.
Owing to Ataturk's atrocities, Christians have disappeared from Turkey and Asia Minor. Today Christians number only about 0.2 per cent of the population in Turkey. Winston Churchill referred to Ataturk's "vast massacre of its Christian population" in the name of establishing "Turkey for Turks." The city of Nicaea, where under the leadership of Constantine the Great, the first council of the Catholic Church was held in A.D. 325 and produced the Nicene Creed, today has no Christians left.
Curiously, many of these Christians whom Ataturk slaughtered were schismatic Greek Orthodox, the very group to which Prevost has been playing the sycophant in the name of "oecumenism." Nevertheless, Ataturk was just sensible enough to replace Turkey's Arabic-based writing with a far more efficient Roman Latin-based script, through which Roman culture had permeated the Roman Empire and its decendants in the known world, and to convert Turkey's archaic measurement units into the scientifically-based Greco-Romano-Gallic Metric System. [Some information for this Commentary was contributed by Breitbart.]
Traditional Catholics, Ataturk engaged in the ethnical cleansing of Armenians and Greeks by large-scale exterminations and atrocities. He committed numerous atrocities as President of "New Turkey" and was often called "Dictator," admired in his time by Adolph Hitler and Benito Mussolini. Yet this is the man whom Pseudo-Newpope Prevost chose to highlight and venerate on his first Newpapal junket. It marks Prevost's pseudo-papacy with the stench of ignominy from its outset.
On November 17, 2025, apostate Pseudo-Newpope Prevost-Leo summoned a fourth commission to push the notion of deaconesses for his Synodal Newchurch. He will keep trying until he flips one of these commissions to give him the answer he wants, not the right answer. His agents point to "critical tensions regarding clericalism and male chauvinism." These terms were invented by the Pseudo-Newpopes to help them eventually dump clergy altogether in their Synodal Church (which itself is an heretical Protestant notion) and insert male and (mostly) female lay ministers like the heretic Protestants into what Newchurch calls the "leadership."
Apostate Pseudo-Newpope Prevost-Leo and his Synodal Newchurch of the New Age is bound and determined to install deaconesses in Newchurch, even though no fewer than three previous Newchurch commissions have found that installed deaconesses never existed in the Catholic Church. Deaconesses are, however, a confirmed part of the heretic Anglican-Episcopalian sect, however, which in short order followed the installation of deaconesses with that of presbyteresses and bishopesses. It is once again the principle of the camel's nose under the test. Get the deaconesses in, and the presbyteresses and bishopesses will soon follow. [Some information for this Commentary was contributed by the National Catholic Reporter.]
Traditional Catholics, Pseudo-Newpope Prevost and his Synodal Newchurch have called for "greater participation of all components of the People of God -- especially women and families --in the formation of ordained ministers." That is what the Synodal Newchurch, which is most certainly NOT the Catholic Church, now calls what were once priests, but in 1968 stopped ordaining priests altogether, instead "installing" what were called "presbyters" (ministers), who are just as invalid as heretic Protestant ministers. At this point there is really no difference between the Synodal Newchurch of the New Order and the heretic Protestant Churches. They are both apostate sects.
The painting represents the moment immediately preceding the crucifixion of St. Andrew, at which Saint is stripped of his clothes while the torturers arrange the wooden poles from which he will be hung, as St. Andrew was tied and not nailed to the decussate cross, so as not to resemble in any way the sacrifice of Jesus.
Return to Daily Commentaries from the TRADITIO Fathers.